Search Results for "investigation delay"

3465 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3465 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Anticipatory Bail to Accused in SC/ST Act Case Due to Lack of Caste-Based Intent. Traffic Dispute Leading to Abusive Language Does Not Attract Section 3(1)(x) of SC/ST Act as Insult Was Not on Account of Caste.

The appellant, Dada @ Anil s/o Navnath Murkute, filed a criminal appeal under Section 14-A of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Preventio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Grievous Hurt Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence. Medical evidence failed to corroborate alleged assault with axe and stick under Sections 326 and 324 read with Section 34 IPC.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order dated 6.1.2000 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Purna, in Regular Crim...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Demand. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to establish demand of bribe beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Sewakdas Tukaram Jumde, was convicted by the trial court for offences under Section 7 and Section 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Proof of Homicidal Death and Unreliable Eyewitness. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The case involves two criminal appeals arising from Sessions Case No.143 of 2006. The appellant, Sahebrao Lukdu Jadhav (original accused no.2), was co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of IGST with Interest for Zero-Rated Export Supplies Under CGST and IGST Acts. Petitioner entitled to refund of IGST paid on export of goods along with interest from date of shipping bill till actual refund.

The petitioner, Shri Charan Singh Surjit Singh Gujral, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of J...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(3) IPC and Section 6 POCSO Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Abdul Khadar @ Rafiq, was convicted by the Child Friendly Court, Bengaluru, in Spl.C.C.No.30/2016 for offences under Section 376(3) IPC...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Dacoity Case Due to Lack of Identification and Recovery — State fails to prove guilt under Sections 395 and 397 IPC as witnesses could not identify accused and no stolen property recovered.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order dated 16.02.2004 of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Kelapur, in Sessions Trial...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Doctor in Medical Negligence Case — Lack of Prima Facie Case Under Section 304A IPC. Allegations of Surgery Against Medical Advice and Negligent Treatment Did Not Disclose Offence of Culpable Homicide Not Amounting to Murder.

The petitioner, Dr. Seema Manohar Gunjal, a medical officer, filed a criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seek...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Criminal Appeals Filed by 23 Accused Convicted for Murder, Rioting, and Damaging Property Under IPC and Bombay Police Act. Trial Court Convicted Accused for Offences Including Section 302 r/w 149 IPC, Stemming from Inter-Community Political Violence in Village Talaghar.

These four criminal appeals, heard together by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, arise from Sessions Case No.79 of 2004 decided by the Additiona...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Writ Petition Against Preventive Detention Order Under Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981. Challenge Centers on Whether Non-Literal Translation of Right to Representation in Marathi Vitiates Detention Under Article 22(5) of Constitution.

The matter arose from a criminal writ petition filed by the detenu under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the order of preventive ...