Search Results for "dispute arising under contract"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "dispute arising under contract"

3222 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3222 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Central Excise Case — Cutting and Grooving of Aluminum Composite Panels Does Not Amount to Manufacture. Process of cutting, grooving, and routing ACPs for façade cladding does not bring into existence a new product with distinct name, character, and use under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

27 May 2026

The appellant, is a construction contractor that imports Aluminum Composite Panels (ACPs) and undertakes cutting, grooving, and routing of these panel...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Share Dispute Case — Upholds Trial Court's Refusal of Interim Injunction. Court held that the appellants failed to establish a prima facie case for restraining the pledge of shares, as the shares were not proved to be held in a fiduciary capacity.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves a dispute between two branches of the Arya family over shares of Arya Iron & Steel Co. Pvt. Ltd. The appellants, Ravi Arya and other...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Award in Distributorship Dispute — Rejects Claim for Loss of Profits for Period Without Written Agreement. The court held that the arbitrator's finding that no implied contract existed for the period 14th June 2006 to 31st March 2007 was not perverse or against public policy under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

9 Jun 2015

The petitioner, Diversey India Private Limited, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitr...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes One-Year Renewal of Stage Carriage Permits Under Section 58 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1939. Renewal Period Must Conform to Original Permit Period, Minimum Three Years.

6 Nov 1959

The case originated from the expiry of stage carriage permits held by the petitioners on March 31, 1958. They applied for renewal before the Regional ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Award Rejecting Securities Claim on Grounds of Forum Shopping. Petitioners Contend That Regulatory Proceedings Against Clearing Member and Arbitration Against Depository Are Distinct, Allowing Simultaneous Pursuit Under Indemnity Principles.

23 Dec 2025

This matter arises from a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Contract Dispute for Lack of Merit. Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenge fails as no patent illegality or perversity found in award rejecting damages for breach of contract.

30 Jun 2026

The present petition was filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award dated 25th March 2021 pas...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Construction Contract Dispute — Holds That Arbitral Tribunal Erred in Rejecting Claims Without Proper Consideration of Contractual Provisions and Evidence. The court found that the tribunal's interpretation of the price variation clause, extra items, and compensation for delay was perverse and contrary to the plain language of the contract, warranting interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

17 Jan 2019

The petitioner, Chenab Bridge Project Undertaking, a joint venture contractor, was awarded a construction contract by the respondent, Konkan Railway C...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Right of Pre-emption in Partition Deed Covenant Binding on Successors-in-Interest. Covenant Not Expressly Binding Assignees Held Enforceable Against Subsequent Purchasers with Notice, and Rule Against Perpetuities Held Inapplicable to Personal Pre-emption Agreements.

6 Sep 1966

The dispute arose out of a partition suit between two brothers, T and K, which was referred to arbitration. The arbitration award divided the joint pr...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Recovery of Liquidated Damages Pending Arbitral Adjudication. Recovery Proceedings Initiated Without Awaiting Outcome of Arbitral Tribunal Under Madhya Pradesh Madhyastham Adhikaran Adhiniyam, 1983 Are Unjustified.

30 Aug 2019

The appellant, a proprietorship firm registered as a Class 'A' contractor, was awarded two contracts for construction and maintenance of rural roads u...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Revenue Appeal on Allowability of Redemption Fine as Business Expenditure Under Section 37 of Income Tax Act. The Appeal Raises the Question Whether Payment of Redemption Fine for Illegal Import of Goods Qualifies as Business Expenditure Under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

22 Feb 2019

In this appeal before the Bombay High Court, the Revenue challenged the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal which had allowed a deduction of Rs...

130 131 132 133 134

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)