Search Results for "deed interpretation"

1683 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1683 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Demolition of Unauthorized Construction on Public Land. Petitioner Failed to Prove Ownership or Authorization for Construction on Land Reserved for Garden Under MRTP Act.

The petitioner, Mohammed Ibrahim Abdul Khalique, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the demolition of a structure on a plo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Accused in Money-Lending Case Due to Inordinate Delay of 33 Years. FIR under Section 39 of Maharashtra Money-Lending (Regulation) Act, 2014 Quashed as Abuse of Process Where Transaction Occurred in 1982 and Civil Suit Pending.

The petitioner, an 85-year-old woman, filed a writ petition seeking quashing of FIR No.21/2015 registered against her under Section 39 of the Maharash...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Section 9 Petition for Appointment of Receiver and Injunction in Loan Default Case. Loan Agreement and Mortgage by Deposit of Title Deeds Established Prima Facie Case for Interim Relief Under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Aditya Birla Finance Limited, a non-banking finance company, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Plaintiff's Summary Suit for Recovery of Contractual Payment in Earth Filling Work Dispute. Court holds that plaintiff proved contract and performance, and defendant failed to prove defence of poor quality or inflated claims.

The plaintiff, Mrs. Prabha P. Shenai, carrying on business as a proprietress in civil construction works under the name M/s. Sterling Engineering Co.,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Reopening of Assessment Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Assessment Year 1990-91. Reassessment Based on Change of Opinion Without Fresh Material is Invalid and Section 45(4) Does Not Apply to Distribution of Assets on Retirement of Partner.

The petitioner, a partnership firm, challenged a notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 dated 21st July 2003 seeking to reopen the asses...