Search Results for "Tribunal's factual findings"

1785 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1785 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates First Appeal Against Dismissal of Suit for Specific Performance. Cross Objection Filed by Defendants Challenges Direction to Repay with Interest.

The matter arose from a suit for specific performance filed by M/s. Gold Touch Real Estate Private Limited, a real estate developer, against six respo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Reinstatement with Back Wages Granted for Illegal Termination. Workman's Dismissal Without Proper Enquiry and Without Compliance with Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Held Illegal.

The appellant, Chandrashekhar Chintaman Vaidya, was employed by the respondent, National Organic Chemical Industries Ltd., as a workman. He was dismis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Artificer III Seeking Equal Grade Pay with Chief Petty Officer in Indian Navy — Grade Pay Anomaly Not Established as Artificer III is a Lower Rank than Chief Artificer.

The appellant, Manish Kumar Rai, was an Artificer III in the Indian Navy. He challenged the grade pay of Rs.3400 granted to Artificers of Class I, II ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal of Legal Representatives in Motor Accident Claim — Insurer Liable Under Personal Accident Cover for Owner-Driver. Section 163-A of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 does not bar claim for personal accident cover when insured dies while driving own vehicle.

The appeal arises from a judgment of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Nagpur, dated 6th February 2020, which dismissed a claim petition filed by th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Landlord's Petition in Tenancy Dispute — MRT Order Set Aside for Violation of Natural Justice. Restoration of Possession Cannot Be Ordered Without Hearing the Landlord Under Section 84 of Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948.

The petitioners, Kacharu B. Ambekar and others, are the successors-in-interest of the original landlord of agricultural lands bearing Gat No.333 (47 A...