Bombay High Court Allows Appeal of Legal Representatives in Motor Accident Claim — Insurer Liable Under Personal Accident Cover for Owner-Driver. Section 163-A of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 does not bar claim for personal accident cover when insured dies while driving own vehicle.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appeal arises from a judgment of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Nagpur, dated 6th February 2020, which dismissed a claim petition filed by the legal representatives of Vijay Annaji Khandar. The deceased was the owner and driver of a Jeep insured with the National Insurance Company Limited. On 16th October 2004, while driving on Saoner-Nagpur Road, he swerved to avoid a head-on collision with a Tata Sumo and dashed his Jeep into a tree, succumbing to injuries. The claimants filed a petition under Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking compensation under the personal accident cover of the insurance policy. The insurance company contested, arguing that the deceased being the owner-driver was not a third party and that the policy did not cover loss to the insured. The Tribunal upheld this objection, holding that the owner/insured cannot be considered a third party and exonerated the company. The High Court framed the issue of whether the Tribunal had jurisdiction to decide such a claim and the extent of the insurer's liability under the personal accident cover. The court noted that the existence of a valid insurance policy was undisputed and that the personal accident cover was a distinct contractual benefit. The court held that the Tribunal had jurisdiction under Section 163-A, which provides for no-fault liability, and that the claim was maintainable even though the deceased was the owner-driver. The court allowed the appeal, set aside the Tribunal's order, and directed the insurance company to pay compensation as per the personal accident cover, with interest.

Headnote

A) Motor Accident Claims - Jurisdiction - Section 163-A Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Claim by legal representatives of owner-driver - The Tribunal has jurisdiction to entertain a claim petition under Section 163-A even when the deceased is the owner-driver and no other vehicle is involved, as the claim is based on the personal accident cover in the insurance policy and not on third-party liability. (Paras 1-10)

B) Insurance Law - Personal Accident Cover - Owner-driver - The insurance company is liable to pay compensation under the personal accident cover when the insured dies while driving the insured vehicle, as the cover is a contractual benefit independent of third-party claims. (Paras 11-15)

C) Motor Vehicles Act - Section 163-A - No-fault liability - The principle of no-fault liability under Section 163-A applies to claims under the personal accident cover, and the Tribunal can adjudicate such claims. (Paras 5-10)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal has jurisdiction to entertain a claim petition under Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 when the deceased is the owner-driver of the insured vehicle and no other vehicle is involved, and whether the insurance company is liable under the personal accident cover in the policy.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal allowed. The judgment of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal dated 06/02/2020 is set aside. The insurance company is directed to pay compensation to the appellants as per the personal accident cover in the insurance policy, with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of filing of the claim petition until realization.

Law Points

  • Personal accident cover
  • owner-driver
  • third party
  • Section 163-A Motor Vehicles Act
  • 1988
  • jurisdiction of MACT
  • no-fault liability
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2020 LawText (BOM) (09) 72

First Appeal No. 378 of 2020

2020-09-29

S.M. Modak, J.

Shri H.P. Lingayat for Appellants, Shri B.P. Bhatt for Respondent

Smt. Mangala wd/o Vijay Khandar, Ku. Pallavi d/o Vijay Khandar, Sagar s/o Vijay Khandar, Smt. Indubai wd/o Annaji Khandar

National Insurance Company Limited

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

First appeal against judgment of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal dismissing claim petition under Section 163-A of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

Remedy Sought

Appellants (legal representatives of deceased) sought compensation from respondent insurance company under personal accident cover of insurance policy.

Filing Reason

Deceased Vijay Khandar, owner-driver of insured Jeep, died in accident while driving; insurance company denied liability claiming deceased was not a third party.

Previous Decisions

Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Nagpur, by judgment dated 06/02/2020, dismissed the claim petition holding that owner/insured cannot be said to be a third party and exonerated the insurance company.

Issues

Whether the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal has jurisdiction to entertain a claim petition under Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 when the deceased is the owner-driver of the insured vehicle and no other vehicle is involved? Whether the insurance company is liable under the personal accident cover in the policy for the death of the owner-driver?

Submissions/Arguments

Appellants argued that the personal accident cover in the policy is a contractual benefit and the Tribunal has jurisdiction under Section 163-A, which is a no-fault liability provision. Respondent insurance company argued that the deceased being the owner-driver is not a third party, and the policy does not cover loss to the insured; also contended that the earlier claim under Section 166 was withdrawn and a fresh petition under Section 163-A is not maintainable.

Ratio Decidendi

The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal has jurisdiction to entertain a claim under Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 even when the deceased is the owner-driver of the insured vehicle, as the claim is based on the personal accident cover which is a contractual benefit independent of third-party liability. The insurance company is liable to pay compensation under the personal accident cover.

Judgment Excerpts

The issue involved in this appeal is about liability of insurance company to pay as per clause of 'personal accident cover' in the insurance policy. The issue is whether the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal has got jurisdiction to decide such claim petition.

Procedural History

Claimants filed petition under Section 163-A of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 before Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Nagpur. Tribunal dismissed petition on 06/02/2020. Claimants filed First Appeal No. 378 of 2020 before Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench. Judgment reserved on 14/09/2020 and pronounced on 29/09/2020.

Acts & Sections

  • Motor Vehicles Act, 1988: 163-A
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Tehsildar in Land Settlement Case — Unexplained Delay of 14 Years and Absence of Extraneous Influence Render Chargesheet Unsustainable. Quasi-Judicial Officer Cannot Be Disciplined for a Wrong Order Without Allegation...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Appeal of Legal Representatives in Motor Accident Claim — Insurer Liable Under Personal Accident Cover for Owner-Driver. Section 163-A of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 does not bar claim for personal accident cover when insured ...