Search Results for "assessee company"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "assessee company"

1476 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1476 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Act for Non-Consideration of Settlement Application. Preventive detention order set aside as detaining authority failed to consider detenu's pending settlement application under Customs Act and Central Excise Act before passing order.

27 Jul 2006

The petitioner, brother-in-law of the detenu Charles Patrick, challenged the detention order dated 5.5.2006 passed under Section 3(1) of the Conservat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition by Provident Fund Commissioner Challenging Reduction of Damages Under Section 14B of EPF Act. Appellate Tribunal's Power to Reduce Damages Up to 50% Under Para 32B(c) of the Scheme Upheld for Delayed Remittance from April 1993 to November 1996.

5 Sep 2014

The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner and Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner (the Corporation) filed a writ petition challenging the order dated...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Denial of Advance Authorization Benefits for Export of Pharmaceutical Products. Court holds that denial of benefits under Para 4.1.5 of Foreign Trade Policy on ground of non-fulfillment of condition of minimum value addition is unsustainable as the condition was not applicable to the product in question.

1 Aug 2016

The petitioners, Sandoz Private Limited and Lupin Limited, are pharmaceutical companies engaged in the manufacture and export of pharmaceutical produc...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Denial of Advance Authorization Benefits for Export of Pharmaceutical Products. Court holds that the condition of 'direct physical handling' of goods by the applicant is not a mandatory requirement under the Foreign Trade Policy and that the Policy does not prohibit third-party procurement or supply.

1 Aug 2016

The petitioners, Sandoz Private Limited and Lupin Limited, are pharmaceutical companies engaged in the manufacture and export of pharmaceutical produc...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund Appeals in GST Case Despite Limitation Bar — Deficiency Memo Not Issued. Rule 92 of CGST Rules, 2017 Mandates Issuance of Deficiency Memo and Opportunity of Hearing Before Rejecting Refund Application; Appellate Authority Must Consider Limitation Issue on Merits.

15 Apr 2026

The petitioner, K Line India Pvt. Ltd., a company providing shipping services, filed refund applications for IGST paid on zero-rated supplies to SEZ u...

High Court

High Court Dismisses CBDT's Challenge to CAT Order Quashing Charge Sheet Against Income Tax Officer. Acquittal in Criminal Case on Same Facts Justifies Quashing of Disciplinary Proceedings, Even if Acquittal Not Honourable.

8 Apr 2024

The petitioners, the Chairman of the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT), the Revenue Secretary, and the Under Secretary to the Government of India, ...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows Revision of GST TRAN-1 to Claim Transitional Credit Due to Technical Glitch. Petitioner permitted to file revised FORM GST TRAN-1 under Section 140(8) of CGST Act, 2017 to correct inadvertent error in transferring credit to branch.

28 Mar 2019

The petitioner, M/S Atria Convergence Technologies Ltd, a public limited company registered under the Companies Act, 1956 and the Central Goods and Se...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision of GST TRAN-1 Form for Cenvat Credit Carry Forward Due to Inadvertent Error. The court permitted the petitioner to correct an inadvertent transfer of credit to a branch in Hyderabad, directing the respondents to allow filing of a revised TRAN-1 under Section 140(8) of the CGST Act, 2017.

28 Mar 2019

The petitioner, M/s Atria Convergence Technologies Ltd, a public limited company registered under the Companies Act, 1956 and the Central Goods and Se...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Partial Rebate Under KVAT Act for Dealer Selling Both Taxable and Exempted Goods — Section 17 Read with Rule 131 Applicable Even When Exempted Goods Are Sold Under Section 5(3) Notification. The court held that the expression 'exempted goods under Section 5' in Section 17 includes goods exempted under a notification issued under Section 5(3) of the KVAT Act.

10 Aug 2016

The petitioner, M/s Jindal Aluminium Ltd., a company incorporated under the Indian Companies Act, filed multiple revision petitions under Section 65(1...

High Court

Bombay High Court Issues Rule in Challenge to GST Demand Confirmation Order. Petition Challenges Order Confirming GST Demand of Rs 70.57 Crores for April 2020 to March 2021.

30 Jun 2025

The petitioner, GlobeOp Financial Services (India) Private Limited (the surviving entity after its merger with GlobeOp Financial Services Technologies...

128 129 130 131 132

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)