Search Results for "Partnership dispute"

2055 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2055 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Occupancy Certificate and Refund of Security Deposit in CIDCO Development Dispute. Court holds that the developer failed to comply with development control regulations and that the petition was not maintainable due to disputed facts and alternative remedies.

The petitioners, La'BuilDe Associates and its managing partner Bhagvanji Raiyani, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Time-Barred Debt. Debt or Liability Must Be Legally Enforceable on the Date of Cheque Issuance Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The appellant, M. Shantilal & Co., a partnership firm, filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 against the respond...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Property Dispute Against Municipal Corporation — Suit Barred by Limitation and Res Judicata. Claim for Declaration of Ownership and Injunction Fails as Plaintiff Failed to Prove Title and Suit Was Filed Beyond Limitation Period Under Limitation Act, 1963.

The appeal arises from a suit filed in 1979 by the original plaintiff, Motilal Mahadev Sharma, against the Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay see...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals by Hindustan Petroleum and Dealer in Eviction Suit — Lease Termination Valid Under Section 111(g) of Transfer of Property Act, 1882. Notice to Quit Properly Served and Not Waived by Acceptance of Rent.

The case involves two appeals arising from a suit for eviction filed by Dilip Prabhakar Dingorkar (the owner/lessor) against M/s. Hindustan Petroleum ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Inclusion of Dry Fruits Under APMC Act — Notifications Ultra Vires. Definition of Agricultural Produce Under Section 2(a) of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1963 is Exhaustive and Does Not Include Dry Fruits/Dry Dates.

The petitioner, a partnership firm dealing in dry fruits and dry dates, challenged the validity of notifications dated 20.6.1988 and 18.10.1988 issued...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Reservation of Tenements for Government Nominees in Urban Land Ceiling Case. Reservation of 10% Tenements for Government Nominees Upheld as Valid Under Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976.

The petitioners, Komalsingh Sonusingh Pardeshi and M/s. Makhija & Vora Associates, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus to direct the respondents ...