Search Results for "Maharashtra Act 1961"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Maharashtra Act 1961"

2224 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2224 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Declares Election of Dadaji Bhuse Void for Improper Acceptance of Nomination Due to Non-Disclosure of Offence Description in Affidavit. The court holds that candidate must provide description of criminal cases in Form 26 affidavit under Section 33A, RPA; mere mention of IPC section is insufficient, and non-compliance renders election void under Section 100(1)(d).

23 Feb 2011

The petitioner, Arjunadada Dashrath Bhuse, filed an election petition under Section 80 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, challenging the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Sarpanch Election Due to Alternative Remedy Under Section 16 of Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961. Election Dispute Must Be Raised via Election Petition, Not Under Article 226.

20 Mar 2018

The petitioner, Gokul Chandanmal Sangvi, a defeated candidate in the Sarpanch election of Grampanchayat Fagne, filed a writ petition under Article 226...

High Court

High Court Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Involving Rural Election Authorities and Agriculturist Petitioners. No Substantive Order or Legal Findings Are Provided in the Extract.

1 Jan 1970

The provided judgment text consists of the opening pages of a hearing notice or order from the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad...

High Court

Bombay High Court disposes of criminal writ petition and appeal concerning illegal occupation of flats by petitioner and family. The court considers the legality of the FIR and the order of the Special MPID Court in the context of SARFAESI and MPID proceedings.

27 Sep 2012

By this common judgment, the High Court disposed of Criminal Writ Petition No.2414 of 2005 and Criminal Appeal No.688 of 2006. The writ petitioner, In...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Suo Moto Notice Under Maharashtra Agricultural Land Ceiling Act for Delay Beyond Limitation Period. Additional Commissioner's Notice Issued After 15 Years Held Without Jurisdiction Under Section 45(2) of the Maharashtra Agricultural Land (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961.

7 Mar 2011

The petitioner, Shaikh Ahmed, a resident of Parbhani, filed a return under Section 12 of the Maharashtra Agricultural Land (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Land Acquisition Notifications and Award for Highway Project Due to Incorrect Land Descriptions. Petitioners' lands were wrongly described in Section 3A and 3D notifications under the National Highways Act, 1956, leading to denial of opportunity to object and violation of principles of natural justice.

3 Aug 2023

The petitioners, Govind Poslya Gavit and Vilas Vijaysing Valvi, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the land acquisition pr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Election Petition for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Requirements Under Representation of the People Act, 1951. Failure to Furnish Attested Copies and Official Transcripts of CDs Renders Petition Liable for Summary Dismissal.

7 Mar 2017

The case involves an election petition filed by Adam Narsayya Narayan challenging the election of Praniti Shinde (Respondent No.1) from Solapur City C...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner in Ceiling Act Case Due to Inordinate Delay in Suo Moto Notice. Additional Commissioner's Power Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Land (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 Must Be Exercised Within Reasonable Time, Not After 17 Years.

7 Mar 2011

The petitioner, Shantabai Sundarrao Deshmukh, is the legal representative of Sundarrao Rangrao Deshmukh, who died on 31.01.1989. The husband of the pe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Suo Moto Reopening Notice Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Land (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 Due to Inordinate Delay. Additional Commissioner's Power to Reopen Enquiry Must Be Exercised Within Reasonable Time, Not Beyond Three Years from Original Order.

7 Mar 2011

The petitioner, Subhadrabai, is the legal heir of Hanumansingh Parihar, who died in 1986. Hanumansingh had filed a return under Section 12 of the Maha...

High Court

High Court Quashes Suo Motu Reopening Notice Under Ceiling Act for Being Time-Barred — Limitation Period of 3 Years Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Land (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 Must Be Strictly Adhered To.

7 Mar 2011

The petitioners, legal heirs of deceased Sidram Ganpatrao Solunke, were original land holders in proceedings under the Maharashtra Agricultural Land (...

128 129 130 131 132

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)