Search Results for "surplus declaration"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "surplus declaration"

270 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 270 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition for Reopening of Land Tribunal Proceedings to Consider Daughters' Shares Under Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005. The court directed the Land Tribunal to reconsider the declaration of the petitioner's father in light of the amended Section 6 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, granting equal rights to daughters.

2 Jan 2017

The petitioner, Smt. Shakuntala, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking to quash the orders of the Land...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Specific Performance of Agreement for Sale of Trust Property — Plaintiff Failed to Prove Readiness and Willingness. Agreement for Sale of Charitable Trust Land Requires Sanction Under Section 36 of Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950; Time Was Not of Essence but Plaintiff's Conduct Showed Lack of Readiness.

4 Mar 2015

The plaintiff, Bastion Constructions, a partnership firm engaged in building and development, filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement fo...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds UGC Regulations on Deemed Universities — Regulations Held Valid and Not Ultra Vires. The court dismissed petitions challenging the UGC (Institutions Deemed to be Universities) Regulations 2010, finding them within the rule-making power under Section 26 of the UGC Act, 1956 and not violative of Articles 14 and 19 of the Constitution.

22 May 2014

The judgment involves multiple writ petitions filed by deemed universities, including Manipal University and Sri Siddartha Academy of Higher Education...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Suo Moto Reopening Notices Under Ceiling Act Due to Limitation. Additional Commissioner's power under Section 45(2) of the Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 must be exercised within three years from the date of the original order; notices issued after 16 years are barred.

7 Mar 2011

The petitioner, Balasaheb Bhaurao Muley, a resident of village Irlad, was the original land holder in proceedings under the Maharashtra Agricultural L...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Quashing Suo Moto Notice Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Land Ceiling Act Due to 16-Year Delay. The Court Held That Revisional Power Must Be Exercised Within Reasonable Time, and a Delay of 16 Years Is Unreasonable.

7 Mar 2011

The petitioner, Ansiram Gundiram Gavane, was a landholder in Parbhani, Maharashtra. In 1975, he filed a return under Section 12 of the Maharashtra Agr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Suo Moto Notice Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Land Ceiling Act — Notice Issued After 17 Years Quashed for Being Beyond Limitation Period. The court held that the Additional Commissioner must initiate suo moto enquiry within 3 years from the date of the original order, and failure to do so renders the notice without jurisdiction.

7 Mar 2011

The petitioner, Pandit Dnyanoba Gawali, as legal heir of deceased Dnyanoba Ramkrishnarao Gawali, challenged a notice dated 03.09.1992 issued by the Ad...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner's Challenge to Reopening of Ceiling Proceedings After 15 Years. Inordinate Delay and Violation of Natural Justice Render Suo Motu Revision Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 Unsustainable.

7 Mar 2011

The petitioner, Madan Shendge, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 20th April 1992 passed by the Additional Commissioner, Aurangabad Div...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening of Ceiling Proceedings After 15 Years Due to Inordinate Delay. Suo Moto Revision Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 Held Invalid for Lack of Reasonable Time and Violation of Natural Justice.

7 Mar 2011

The petitioner, Dyanoba S/o Bapurao Shendge, filed a writ petition challenging the judgment and order dated 20th April 1992 passed by the Additional C...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Suo Moto Notice Under Maharashtra Agricultural Land Ceiling Act for Delay Beyond Limitation Period. Additional Commissioner's Notice Issued After 15 Years Held Without Jurisdiction Under Section 45(2) of the Maharashtra Agricultural Land (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961.

7 Mar 2011

The petitioner, Shaikh Ahmed, a resident of Parbhani, filed a return under Section 12 of the Maharashtra Agricultural Land (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Land Acquisition Declaration for Sugar Factory Due to Non-Compliance with Section 5A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Collector Failed to Prepare Independent Report or Submit Recommendations, Relying Instead on Beneficiary's Chart, Rendering Section 6 Declaration Invalid.

21 Mar 2006

The petitioners, Sukumar M. Khot and others, challenged a declaration under Section 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, published on 23 June 2005, wh...

11 12 13 14 15

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)