Search Results for "settlement stay"

1060 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1060 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Quashes Ex-Parte Interim Order of Industrial Tribunal in Industrial Dispute Reference. Petitioner Employer Succeeds in Challenging Interim Relief Granted Without Hearing and Without Reasons Under Section 10 of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The petitioner, Agew Steel Manufacturers Private Limited, challenged an interim order dated 11.11.2022 passed by the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad, b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Workman's Appeal for Wages from Date of Reinstatement Award to Actual Reinstatement Despite Stay. Employer Cannot Deny Wages for Period of Stay Obtained by Itself Under Section 33-C(2) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The appellant, D.N. Krishnappa, was a workman employed with the respondent bank. He was dismissed from service on 27.09.1996. The Central Government I...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Family Court Order Disturbing Child Custody Based on Consent Without Welfare Inquiry. The court held that a custody order under Section 8 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 cannot be passed solely on consent without considering the welfare of the child.

The case involves an appeal by the father (Appellant 'A') against a Family Court order dated 15 July 2014 that disturbed the custody of his two minor ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Zilla Parishad's Challenge to Industrial Court Order Granting CRTE Benefits to Daily Wagers. Kalelkar Settlement and Bhole Commission Recommendations Applied to Regularize Temporary Employees After Five Years of Service.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by the Zilla Parishad, Aurangabad, and an individual employee, Gangadhar Kadam, against an order of the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Pension Benefits to Retired Bank Employee Despite Delay in Deposit of Contribution Amount Under Joint Note Dated 27 April 2010. The court held that the three-day period for deposit was unreasonable and that the petitioner's substantial compliance warranted granting pension.

The petitioner, Ramesh Gajanan Nigudkar, joined the Bank of Baroda as a subordinate staff member on 4 March 1967 and retired after 39 years of unblemi...