Search Results for "salary difference"

597 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 597 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Retired Civil Servant's Writ Petition Challenging Tribunal Order — No Entitlement to Difference in Pension Without Proper Claim. Petitioner failed to establish any legal right to differential pension under Karnataka Municipal Administration Service Rules.

The petitioner, Sadashivappa, a retired civil servant from the Karnataka Municipal Administration Service, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Labour Court Orders in Industrial Dispute — Petitioner Company Failed to Show Perversity or Jurisdictional Error in Awards Granting Relief to Workmen.

The petitioner, Electropneumatics And Hydraulics India Pvt. Ltd., filed two writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging separate ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions of Retired Employees Seeking Pensionary Benefits Under Zilla Parishad and Jeevan Pradhikaran Rules. Court Holds That Prior Service as Daily Wagers Counts Towards Qualifying Service for Pension After Absorption.

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed by retired employees of the Zilla Parishad, Latur, and Maharashtra Jeevan Pradhikaran. The petitione...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Lack of Fresh Material. Reassessment Based on Change of Opinion on Deduction Under Section 10AA of Income Tax Act, 1961 is Invalid.

The petitioner, Oracle Financial Services Software Limited, is a company engaged in providing information technology solutions to banks and financial ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Education Officer in Bribery Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Contradictory Evidence. Conviction under Section 161 IPC and Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Demand and Acceptance Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Harishchandra Prabhakar Borkar, was the Education Officer of Zilla Parishad, Nagpur. He was convicted by the Special Judge, Nagpur, in ...