Search Results for "retrospective recovery"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to Deemed Conveyance in Favor ...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Act Case — Upholds Appointment ...
Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Murder Under Section 302 I...
High Court of Bombay Quashes Deputy Registrar's Directives in Co-operative Socie...

Search Results for "retrospective recovery"

288 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 288 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Reopens Death Penalty Review Petition for Open Court Hearing Following Constitutional Bench Precedent. The Court recalled an earlier dismissal by circulation and ordered an open court hearing based on Mohd. Arif v Registrar, Supreme Court of India, 2014 (9) SCC 737, which mandates oral hearings in death penalty review cases due to the irreversible nature of the penalty.

21 Mar 2023

The judgment involves a convict on death row who filed a review petition seeking a fresh look at his conviction for murder and death sentence, based o...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Manufacturer in Central Excise Duty Dispute on Captive Consumption of Yarn. Court Holds That Bank Guarantees Furnished Under Interim Order Can Be Enforced Without Section 11A Notice.

9 Dec 2019

The appellant, M/s. The Bombay Dyeing & Mfg. Co. Ltd., was engaged in the manufacture of cotton and manmade fabrics. It claimed that the fabric manufa...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Strikes Down Section 87 of Arbitration Act as Unconstitutional — Automatic Stay of Arbitral Awards Revived by 2019 Amendment Held Arbitrary and Violative of Article 14. The court held that the provision reintroducing automatic stay upon filing of a Section 34 application is manifestly arbitrary and contrary to the object of the 2015 Amendment Act.

27 Nov 2019

The judgment concerns a batch of writ petitions challenging the constitutional validity of Section 87 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, i...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Setting Aside District Court's Order That Had Set Aside Arbitral Award on Grounds Beyond Section 34 Scope. The Court Held That Reappreciation of Evidence Is Not Permissible Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and the District Court Exceeded Its Jurisdiction.

21 Nov 2019

The appellant, M/s. Scigen Biopharma Pvt. Ltd., filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an order d...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Quashes Demand for Enhanced Casino Licence Fees Based on Amended Notification Without Retrospective Effect. Notification under Section 13A of the Goa, Daman & Diu Public Gambling Act, 1976 cannot apply to existing licences; recovery set aside.

24 Jun 2019

The petitioners, Advani Hotels & Resorts India Ltd. and its Chairman, operated an onshore casino named 'Goa Nugget' at Caravela Beach Resort in Goa un...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Modvat Credit Case — Upholds CESTAT's Order Setting Aside Demand and Penalty for Violation of Natural Justice. The demand under repealed Rule 57-I was invalid after substitution by CENVAT Rules 2002 and the assessee was denied effective opportunity of hearing.

1 Apr 2019

The Commissioner of Central Excise, Thane-II filed an appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against the order dated 27 May 2005 of ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Pension Dispute Case: Bank Employee Entitled to Pension Despite Joining New Post Without Reporting Back to Parent Department. The Court held that denial of pension under Clause 22(2) of Syndicate Bank Employees Pension Regulations, 1995 was unjustified as there was no interruption in service.

27 Mar 2019

The appellant, Narendra Kumar, joined Syndicate Bank as a Law Officer in 1979. He went on deputation to the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) and Debt Reco...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Recovery of Excess Salary Paid to Employees Due to Wrong Fixation of Pay Scales. The Court held that recovery is permissible when the employee had knowledge of the error or when the mistake is a continuing wrong, and the principle of no recovery does not apply in such cases.

18 Jan 2019

The petitioners, 13 employees of Thane Municipal Corporation, filed a writ petition challenging the Corporation's decision to recover excess salary pa...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Maintainability of Revision Under MRC Act Against Orders Under Bombay Rent Act. Revision petitions under Section 44 of MRC Act, 1999 are not maintainable against orders under Section 13A2 of Bombay Rent Act, 1947 due to repeal and savings provisions in Sections 46 and 58 of MRC Act.

25 Jun 2015

The petitioners, Rameshchandra D. Padia and Chandaya B. Karkera, filed two writ petitions challenging a common order dated 24 February 2014 passed by ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Rent Recovery Suit — Hyderabad Rent Act Applicability During Pendency Does Not Bar Eviction Decree. Section 15(1) of Hyderabad Rent Act does not apply to decrees passed by civil court before the Act's extension to the area.

25 Jun 2012

The respondent/plaintiff filed a suit for recovery of Rs. 5,200 towards arrears of rent, damages, and possession of the suit house against the appella...

11 12 13 14 15

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)