Search Results for "retirement notice"

1583 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1583 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Compulsory Retirement Order as Stigmatic and Invalid. Order of compulsory retirement based on allegations of misconduct without proper inquiry is punitive and stigmatic, requiring prior opportunity of hearing.

The petitioner, J.K. Lonakar, joined the service of the respondent, Karnataka Food and Civil Supplies Corporation Limited, a government-owned company ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Pensionary Benefits of Retired Lecturer Under Maharashtra Pension Rules. Petitioner entitled to regular pension, gratuity, commutation, and leave encashment with interest for 30 years 1 month of service in aided colleges.

The petitioner, Dr. (Mrs.) Parvathi Venkatesh, a retired lecturer aged about 60 years, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Lecturer's Petition for Pensionary Benefits Due to Break in Service. Break in service caused by insufficient workload cannot be condoned for pension eligibility under UGC Regulations.

The petitioner, Dr. (Mrs.) Mangala Veeresh, was appointed as a full-time Lecturer in Zoology at Smt. Parvatibai Chowgule College of Arts & Science (re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Union of India's Appeal in Armed Forces Pension Case, Upholding Terminal Benefits for Resigning Officer. Late Entrant Eligibility Under Regulation 15 of Pension Regulations for the Army, 1961 Applied as Officer Commissioned at Age 39 and Served 15 Years Before Resignation.

The dispute arose from the Armed Forces Tribunal's order directing the Union of India to process terminal and pensionary benefits for a former Army Me...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds State's Appeal in Service Suspension Case; Rule that Order Effective from Issue Date under Punjab Civil Services Rule 3.26(d). Suspension Order Communicated Prior to Retirement Valid Regardless of Receipt, Allowing Disciplinary Dismissal.

The Supreme Court considered an appeal by the State of Punjab against a High Court decision quashing the dismissal of a government servant, Khemi Ram....