Search Results for "rental agreement"

292 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 292 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Appeal in RERA Case for Delay in Possession — Promoter Liable for Interest Under Section 18 of RERA Act, 2016. The court restored the order of TN RERA directing the promoter to pay interest for delay in handing over possession of flat and club house facilities.

The appellant, a retired General Manager of Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited, entered into a Memorandum of Agreement on 30.07.2011 with the respon...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court directed to be considered by the state within six months from the date of the order, granting the respondents the liberty to challenge the decision on the renewal application

Lease agreement for a property in Orissa, initially granted in 1905 and renewed in 1944 for a period of 30 years. Following the expiration of the rene...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Mohd. Ismail Abdul Hadis Maniyar, was convicted by the trial court for the murder of a woman under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to lif...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Eviction Order Under Section 13A(2) of Bombay Rent Act — Licence Not Tenancy. Occupant Failed to Prove Tenancy; Landlord's Licence Claim Accepted.

The revision applicant, Vishnu Tayappa Kamble, challenged an order of the Competent Authority at Pune allowing Application No. 47 of 1996 under Sectio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Share Dispute Case — Upholds Trial Court's Refusal of Interim Injunction. Court held that the appellants failed to establish a prima facie case for restraining the pledge of shares, as the shares were not proved to be held in a fiduciary capacity.

The case involves a dispute between two branches of the Arya family over shares of Arya Iron & Steel Co. Pvt. Ltd. The appellants, Ravi Arya and other...