Search Results for "removal motion"

457 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 457 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging No-Confidence Motion Against Upa-Sarpanch. 3/4th Majority for Removal of Upa-Sarpanch Must Be Calculated Based on Total Members of Panchayat, Not Only Those Present and Voting.

The petitioner, Archna Phulare, was the Upa-Sarpanch of Shivgaon-Pathari Gram Panchayat. A no-confidence motion was passed against her by 7 votes to 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Order of Status Quo and Appointment of Receiver in Property Dispute. Court Holds That Suit for Declaration and Injunction Is Not Barred by Limitation or Res Judicata and That Receiver Cannot Be Removed Without Proper Application.

The appeal arises from a suit filed by the respondents (Afzal Khan and others) against the appellants (Mehboob Ayub Khan and others) seeking declarati...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Waqf Act Jurisdiction Dispute Regarding Suit for Permanent Injunction. Civil Court Jurisdiction for Injunction Suits Involving Waqf Property is Not Barred Under Section 85 of Waqf Act, 1995 When Dispute Does Not Involve Questions About Nature of Property.

The dispute originated from a suit filed by the plaintiff (first respondent) against the defendant (appellant) and others for mandatory and permanent ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Delivers Judgment on Writ Petition Challenging Family Court's Custody Order in International Abduction Case. The Court Examined the Applicability of Hague Convention and Jurisdictional Overlaps Between Indian and Dutch Forums.

The judgment addresses a custody dispute between parents of a minor daughter, Insiya. The father, an Indian citizen, and the mother, a dual citizen of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Customs Appeal Against CESTAT Order Setting Aside Penalty and Confiscation. Import of Vessels for Offshore Exploration Not Liable to Penalty Under Customs Act for Alleged Misdeclaration of Value.

The Commissioner of Customs (Imports), Mumbai, filed an appeal under Section 130(1) of the Customs Act, 1962 against a common order dated 14th August ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction in Trademark Infringement Case: 'ROFOL' vs 'PROFOL'. Prior Registration of 'ROFOL' by Plaintiff in 1992 Entitles Injunction Against Defendant's Deceptively Similar Mark 'PROFOL' Under Section 29 of Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958.

The plaintiff, M/s. Neon Laboratories Limited, filed a suit for infringement and passing off against the defendants, M/s. Medical Technologies Ltd. an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals in Cricket Association Election Dispute — Interim Order Set Aside for Lack of Jurisdiction. Court holds that disputes relating to internal elections of a society are not maintainable in civil court without exhausting remedies under the Societies Registration Act, 1860.

The case involves two appeals arising from a suit filed by Gopinath Munde against the Mumbai Cricket Association (MCA) and its office bearers, includi...