Search Results for "partnership deed"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to Deemed Conveyance in Favor ...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Act Case — Upholds Appointment ...
Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Murder Under Section 302 I...
High Court of Bombay Quashes Deputy Registrar's Directives in Co-operative Socie...

Search Results for "partnership deed"

641 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 641 result(s)

High Court

Forfeiture of Tenancy under Section 111(g) TPA Not Attracted When Tenant Claims Firm Tenancy Without Denying Landlord’s Title – Bombay High Court Restores Trial Court Decree in Second Appeal No. 81 of 2013 (2026)

4 Mar 2026

The plaintiff filed a suit for possession, arrears of rent, and damages claiming that Late Mohd. Siddique was his tenant since 1960. Lat...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Application to Implead Legal Representatives in Partition Suit — Held That Application Under Order 22 Rule 4 CPC Was Not Maintainable as Defendant No.2 Was Already on Record and No Abatement Had Occurred

8 Sep 2025

The petitioner, Sri Janardhana Suvarna, was Defendant No.2 in O.S.No.233/2016, a suit for partition and separate possession filed by Respondent No.1 (...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Civil Suit on Limitation Grounds, Setting Aside Plaint Rejection. Suit for Declaration of Sale Deed as Void Not Barred by Limitation as Fraud Allegations Under Section 17 of Limitation Act, 1963 Require Factual Inquiry, Making Preliminary Issue Determination Improper Under Order VII Rule 11(d) and Order XIV Rule 2 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

28 Mar 2022

The dispute originated from a civil suit filed by the plaintiff seeking multiple declarations regarding property rights. The plaintiff claimed that a ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeals in Partnership Dispute, Upholds Concurrent Findings on Retirement and Dissolution. Court holds that retirement of a partner from a registered partnership firm does not require registration under the Indian Partnership Act, 1932, and that a suit for dissolution and accounts is maintainable even without registration of the firm.

8 Feb 2022

The case involves a dispute among partners of M/s. Mangal Deep, a registered partnership firm. The appellants, who were partners, filed a suit for dec...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes High Court Order Restraining Arrest in Partnership Dispute Involving Allegations of Forgery and Cheating. High Court's Direction to Not Arrest First Respondent Till Next Hearing Was Set Aside as It Lacked Reasons and Involved Serious Criminal Offenses Under Sections 405, 420, 465, 467, 468, 471 IPC.

31 Aug 2021

The appeal arose from a judgment dated 31 March 2021 of a Single Judge of the High Court of Gujarat. The dispute originated from a partnership deed da...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Execution of Arbitration Award as Specific Performance of Agreement for Sale. Arbitration Award Only Fixed Land Price; Executing Court Could Not Direct Sale Deed Execution Beyond Award's Scope.

8 Sep 2020

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Firm Rajasthan Udyog and its partners against Hindustan Engineering & Industries Ltd. The dispute origin...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Petition for Appointment of Arbitrator by Unregistered Partnership Firm Under Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Bar Under Section 69(2) of Indian Partnership Act, 1932 Does Not Apply to Arbitration Proceedings as They Are Not Suits to Enforce Rights.

1 Feb 2019

The petitioners, M/s. Sri Vishal Bhavan, an unregistered partnership firm, and its partner H.N. Jayaprakash, filed a petition under Section 11(6) of t...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Trademark Infringement Case — Temporary Injunction Granted to Protect Registered Trademark 'Cothas' Against Deceptively Similar Mark 'Cotha'. Prior Registration and Use of 'Cothas' Since 1995 Establishes Prima Facie Case Under Sections 28 and 29 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

31 Jul 2017

The appellant, M/s. Cothas Coffee Co., a registered partnership firm, filed a suit for permanent injunction against the respondents, M/s. Cotha Associ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Petitions, Upholds Arbitrator's Jurisdiction Over Counter-Claim in Partnership Dispute. Arbitration Clause Survives Dissolution of Firm Under Section 16 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

3 Apr 2014

The case involves two arbitration petitions challenging an order of a Sole Arbitrator under Section 16 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Retrospective Penalty Under Section 69A of Indian Partnership Act, 1932 for Non-Intimation of Alterations. The court upheld the validity of the Maharashtra Amendment Act 29 of 1984 imposing retrospective penalty for failure to intimate changes in partnership deeds.

26 Sep 2006

The petitioners, M/s. Adamji Lookmanji & Co. and others, filed a writ petition challenging orders dated 25th April, 2005 and 12th October, 2004 passed...

11 12 13 14 15

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)