Search Results for "maximum damages"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "maximum damages"

428 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 428 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Section 34 Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Construction Dispute — No Ground for Interference Made Out. Arbitrator's findings on facts and law are final unless perverse or contrary to public policy; reappreciation of evidence not permissible under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

6 Feb 2012

The petitioner, M/s. Shah Jagshi Jethabhai, a construction firm, challenged an arbitral award dated 16 January 2009 passed by a sole arbitrator under ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal as Not Maintainable Under Section 13 of Commercial Courts Act, 2015 for Arbitration Matters with Claim Value Less Than One Crore. Appeal against order under Section 10 of Commercial Courts Act, 2015 is not maintainable as the subject matter of arbitration is not a commercial dispute of specified value.

25 Apr 2016

The appellant, Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd., filed an appeal under Section 13 of the Commercial Courts, Commercial Division and Commercial Appellate...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in Arbitration Act Case Regarding Foreign Award Enforcement. Non-Signatory Parties Not Bound by Arbitration Agreement Under Alter Ego Doctrine for Enforcement Under Part II of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

10 Aug 2021

The Supreme Court of India heard civil appeals concerning the recognition and enforcement of foreign awards under Part II of the Arbitration and Conci...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Arbitration Petition in Interest on Security Deposit Dispute. Contractual Bar on Interest and Non-Applicability of Section 31(7)(a) Arbitration Act Renders Claim Unsustainable; Arbitrator’s Finding on Evidence Upheld.

11 Aug 2014

The dispute arose from an agreement dated 30 December 1996 between the petitioner, M/s. Mascon Multiservices & Consultants Pvt. Ltd., and the responde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Amendment of Section 88 of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. Insertion of Third and Fourth Provisos Permitting Government Extension of Time for Inquiry Against Delinquent Promoters is Constitutionally Valid and Not Retrospective Penal Legislation.

2 May 2019

The dispute arose from an inquiry under Section 88(1) of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 initiated against former directors of the Ma...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Challenge to Arbitral Award in Pipeline Project Dispute — Interest Modified to Simple Interest. The court held that pre-reference interest was not permissible under the contract and compound interest was contrary to the agreement, modifying the award to simple interest at 18% per annum from the date of the award.

28 Jul 2015

The petitioner, Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited (HPCL), challenged an arbitral award dated 21 February 2012 under Section 34 of the Arbitratio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Mandamus for Insurance Compensation for Crop Loss Due to Pest Attack. Court holds that pest attack is not an insured peril under the Crop Insurance Scheme and that the petitioner failed to establish any legal duty or right to claim compensation.

15 Jan 2015

The petitioner, Libaraj s/o Tulshiram Tikle, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court, Aurang...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Sets Aside Compensation Order Against KSLSA in POCSO Case — Trial Court Cannot Direct Legal Services Authority to Pay Interim Compensation Without Following Procedure Under Section 357A CrPC and POCSO Rules. The appropriate authority for interim compensation under POCSO Act is the District Legal Services Authority or State Government, not KSLSA.

2 Jan 2020

The Karnataka State Legal Services Authority (KSLSA) filed a Criminal Revision Petition under Section 397 read with Section 401 of the Code of Crimina...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Rules on Arbitration Petition No.846 of 2014 Under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act. The Court Considers Whether the Arbitral Award Dated 22 March 2014 Should Be Set Aside in Light of Various Share Sale Agreements Between the Parties.

24 Apr 2015

The matter before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay arose from an arbitration petition filed by Haresh Advani under Section 34 of the Arbitration...

High Court

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Criminal Appeals in Murder Case Under Section 302 IPC, Examining Circumstantial Evidence and Procedural Irregularities. Appellants Challenge Reliability of Recovery and Chain of Custody, Arguing Investigation Delays Vitiate Conviction.

14 Jan 2026

The case arose from a violent incident on 19.1.2011 in Timki Mochipura, Nagpur, where Dinesh Shendekar was killed and his brother Deva and another per...

11 12 13 14 15

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)