Search Results for "hindu undivided family"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "hindu undivided family"

481 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 481 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Mother to Sell Minor Son's Property for Development Under Section 8 of Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956 — Benefit to Minor Must Be Demonstrated. The court held that redevelopment providing a flat and monetary consideration constitutes benefit to the minor under Section 8 of the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956.

1 Jan 2026

The appellant, Shephali Chakraborty, as the natural guardian of her minor son Master Basab Chakraborty, sought permission from the District Judge, Dar...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeals in Property Dispute — Sale Deeds by Coparcener Without Legal Necessity Set Aside. Court holds that a coparcener cannot alienate joint family property without legal necessity or benefit to the estate, and that the burden of proof lies on the alienee to show necessity.

11 Nov 2013

The case involves two second appeals arising from Regular Civil Suit No. 232 of 1983 and Regular Civil Suit No. 74 of 1986, both filed by the appellan...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Dismisses Second Appeal Against Decree for Possession in Minority Property Case — Permission Under Section 8(2) Hindu Minority Act Required. Mother's Sale of Minor's Property Without Court Permission Held Voidable; Burden of Proving Legal Necessity Not Discharged by Purchaser.

4 May 2018

The original plaintiffs filed a suit for possession and mesne profit against the appellant, claiming that the sale deed executed by their mother durin...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Declaration and Possession Suit — Sale Deed by Co-owner Without Consent of Other Co-owners Not Binding on Plaintiff. Transfer of Property Act, 1882, Section 44 — Co-owner cannot transfer undivided share in specific property without consent of other co-owners; decree for possession cannot be granted against co-owner in possession.

23 Feb 2023

The appellant, L Rudramuni Swamy, was the first defendant in a suit filed by the original plaintiff Rachappa @ Rachaiah (since deceased, represented b...

High Court

Madras High Court Pronounces Judgment in Appeal by 9th Defendant Against Decree in Partition and Declaration Suit — Validity of Sale Deeds Executed Without Consent of Co-sharer Questioned

29 Jul 2026

The appeal was filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 by the 9th defendant against the judgment and decree dated 06.03.2020 in O....

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Partition Suit — Rejects Plaint Rejection Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC. Suit for Partition and Separate Possession of Joint Family Property Not Barred by Limitation as Perpetual Right to Seek Partition Recognized Under Hindu Law.

22 Apr 2026

The present Regular First Appeal was filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) challenging the judgment and decree dated 24.02...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Family Property Dispute — Upholds Injunction Against Father from Alienating Joint Family Property. Minor Children's Suit for Partition Through Next Friend Held Maintainable Under Order 32 Rule 1 CPC.

15 Jun 2022

The case involves a family dispute over property. The appellant, Ajay Kumar Garg, is the father and the respondents are his minor children (Avyaay Ani...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Plaintiff's Appeal in Partition Suit Based on Res Judicata and Invalid Will. The suit was barred under Section 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, as prior litigation had conclusively established a valid partition in 1964, extinguishing the testator's ownership rights and rendering the will ineffective.

27 Jan 2022

The dispute originated from a partition suit filed by the plaintiff, who claimed a one-fourth share in joint family properties based on a will execute...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears First Appeals Against Dismissal of Partition Suit. Multiple Appellants Challenge Judgment in O.S. No. 1949/1980 Dismissing Suit for Partition and Separate Possession.

1 Mar 2013

...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Civil Appeal in Family Settlement Admissibility Case - Unregistered Kharurunama and Receipt Admissible as Corroborative Evidence. The Court held that if a family settlement document merely records a pre-existing oral agreement, it does not require registration under Section 17(1)(b) of the Registration Act, 1908 and can be used as evidence for collateral purposes, remanding the matter for trial court determination.

1 Oct 2021

The Supreme Court of India heard a civil appeal arising from a special leave petition, concerning the admissibility of an unregistered family settleme...

11 12 13 14 15

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)