Search Results for "forfeiture"

134 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 134 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows LIC Appeal, Denies Pension to Resigned Employee Under Retrospective Pension Rules. Resignation Forfeits Past Service and Cannot Be Equated with Voluntary Retirement Under LIC Pension Rules, 1995.

The Supreme Court considered a batch of appeals concerning employees of the Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC), United India Insurance Company ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows LIC's Appeal Against Resigned Employee's Pension Claim — Resignation Not Voluntary Retirement Under Pension Rules. Employee Who Resigned Before Pension Scheme Notification Not Entitled to Retrospective Benefits Under LIC Pension Rules, 1995.

The Supreme Court considered a batch of appeals concerning employees of the Life Insurance Corporation of India, United India Insurance Company Limite...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Refund Order in Unfair Trade Practice Case, Denies Specific Performance. Forfeiture of Earnest Money Upheld Due to Buyer's Default Under Clause 10 of Plot Buyer's Agreement.

The appellant, Sudha Gupta, filed an appeal under Section 53T of the Competition Act, 2002 read with Section 55 of the repealed Monopolies and Restric...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in Pension Entitlement Case - Resignation Forfeits Past Service Under Punjab Civil Services Rules. Rule 7.5(1) of Punjab Civil Services Rules disentitles a resigning employee to pension as past service stands forfeited.

The respondent, Gurbaran Singh, was appointed as a pharmacist by the Director Health Services, Punjab on 05.09.1975 on a regular basis. During his ten...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Exclusion of Unauthorised Absence from Qualifying Service for Pension in DTC VRS Cases. The court held that period of absence without authorisation cannot be counted towards qualifying service for pension under CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972, even if employee availed VRS.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by the Delhi Transport Corporation (DTC) against the respondents, ex-employees who had availed of the Vol...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Extension of Time for Filing Written Statement Beyond 120 Days Under Amended CPC. Mandatory Forfeiture of Right to File Written Statement After Expiry of Statutory Period Under Order VIII Rule 1 CPC as Amended by Commercial Courts Act, 2015.

The Supreme Court allowed an appeal against two orders of the High Court that permitted the defendant to file a written statement beyond the statutory...