Search Results for "fair defence"

2405 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2405 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Removal of Employee in Disciplinary Proceeding for Violation of Natural Justice and Proportionality. Charge-sheet and Penalty Set Aside Due to Non-Supply of Documents and Disproportionate Punishment.

The petitioner, Abha Chawla Mohanty, was an employee of the Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. appointed in October 1985. She was served with a charge-sheet ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Motive of Suspicion of Character. Appellant convicted under Section 302 IPC for murder of his sister with axe due to suspicion about her character.

The appellant, Pramod @ Pintya s/o Bhaurao Bodkhe, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Darwha, District Yavatmal, in Sessions Trial No.10/...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Criminal Appeal Against Conviction Under Sections 376(D), 377, 120-B IPC. Appeal Challenges Sessions Court Conviction for Gang Rape and Unnatural Offences at Shakti Mills.

The criminal appeal before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Division Bench) stemmed from the conviction of the appellant-original accused no.1 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging NOC Requirement for Construction Near Naval Area. Court holds that the requirement of NOC from Naval authorities for construction within 500 meters of naval installation is valid and not arbitrary.

The petitioners, Dolby Builders Private Ltd. and its shareholder Girish Agarwal, filed a writ petition challenging the requirement of a No Objection C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Interested Witness. Conviction under Section 302 r/w 34 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness was a close relative and evidence lacked corroboration.

The appellants, Annayappa @ Krishnappa and Babu, were convicted by the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Bangalore Rural, for the murder of Munir...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Holds Order VIII Rule 6A CPC Mandatory for Filing Counterclaim Before Written Statement. Counterclaim Filed After Written Statement Is Not Permissible as Provision Imposes Embargo on Belated Filing.

The Supreme Court of India, in a three-judge bench, addressed a reference regarding the interpretation of Order VIII Rule 6A of the Code of Civil Proc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Examines Constitutionality of Prohibitory Orders Under Section 144 CrPC Restricting Public Assembly. Judgment Clarifies That Reasonable Restrictions on Speech and Assembly Must Be Just, Fair and Reasonable Under Articles 19 and 21.

The Supreme Court initiated a suo motu criminal writ petition regarding the incident at Ramlila Maidan on 4-5 June 2011, involving the imposition of p...