Search Results for "exemption scheme"

1122 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1122 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Discriminatory Sales Tax Rules Under Article 226. Held that Rule 31B and Rule 31AA of the Bombay Sales Tax Rules, 1959 operate in different contexts and do not violate Article 14 of the Constitution.

The petitioners, M/s Graphite India Limited and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Union’s Excise Duty Demand on Steel Wires; Manufacturer’s Challenge Dismissed. Interpretation of Item 26AA of Central Excise Act as a Rate of Duty, Not Dependent on Origin of Raw Material, Confirmed.

The case arose from the imposition of excise duty under the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, on steel wires manufactured by the appellant, J.K. Ste...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Retrospective Amendment to Foreign Trade Policy and Customs Notification. Court Holds That Importers Have No Vested Right in Export Obligation Period and Retrospective Amendment Is Valid to Prevent Misuse of Duty Exemption Scheme.

The Bombay High Court dismissed two writ petitions challenging the validity of Notification No.2(RE 2013)/2009-14 dated 18th April 2013, which retrosp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Examines Validity of Computation of Excess Vacant Land under Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 and Challenges to Vesting Orders. Petitioner Company Claims Non-Buildable Land and Earlier Surrendered Area Must Be Excluded While Computing Excess Vacant Land.

The petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenged the settlement order dated 30 November 2004 under Section 8(4) of the Urban Lan...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of SVLDRS Declaration Due to Procedural Irregularity. Rule 6(2) proviso requiring pre-deposit of 50% of disputed tax before filing declaration under Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 read down as directory, not mandatory.

The petitioner, Nabeel Construction Pvt. Ltd., engaged in construction services, was subjected to an investigation by the Directorate General of GST I...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Local Body Tax Classification. Classification of dealers based on turnover for LBT exemption is valid under Article 14 as it has a rational nexus with the object of the Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act, 1949.

The petitioners, M/s. Nagpur Distillers Private Limited and M/s. Vidarbha Distillers, are dealers within the meaning of Section 2(16A) of the Maharash...