Search Results for "equivalent value"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "equivalent value"

1190 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1190 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Approves Compensation Scheme for Tribal Landowners in Coal Mining Acquisition - Mahanadi Coalfields Directed to Pay Compensation for Lands Acquired in 1987-1989. Market value determined as of 2010 survey date due to 28-year delay in compensation.

3 Nov 2022

The case concerns the long-pending compensation claims of landowners, predominantly tribal communities, whose lands were acquired for coal mining by M...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes CEGAT Order for Non-Consideration of Submissions in Customs Seizure Case. Tribunal's Order Held Invalid as It Did Not Constitute a Decision in the Eye of Law Under Customs Act, 1962.

25 Apr 2006

The petitioner, M/s. Wall Street Finance Ltd., filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 3rd February, 2000 passed by the Customs, Excise and G...

High Court

Bombay High Court hears appeal against CESTAT order upholding duty demand and confiscation of diamonds due to shortage and non-compliance with export obligations — substantial questions raised on interpretation of Notification No. 177/94-Cus and para 8.78B of Handbook of Procedures.

9 May 2012

The appellant, a partnership firm engaged in manufacturing and exporting gold jewellery studded with diamonds at its unit in the Santacruz Electronics...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Time Limit for Availing Input Tax Credit Under Section 16(4) of CGST Act. The court held that the time limit is mandatory and not directory, and retrospective amendments are valid.

30 Nov -0001

The Bombay High Court, in a batch of writ petitions, addressed the constitutional validity and interpretation of Section 16(4) of the Central Goods an...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Dismisses Railway Appeal in Goods Loss Case — Non-Declaration of Value Does Not Bar Compensation Under Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987. The court held that the railway administration, as a bailee, is liable for loss of goods even if the consignor did not declare their value, and the burden of proof to show reasonable care or exception lies on the railway.

13 Feb 2014

The respondent, M/s Satya Sai Exports, booked a consignment of shed antlers of Sambhar and Chital weighing 240 kilogrammes under Railway Receipt No. F...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals by Competition Commission of India and Kapoor Glass in Abuse of Dominance Case — No Abuse Found in Volume Discounts and Contractual Terms by Dominant Glass Tubing Manufacturer. The court held that volume discounts are not per se abusive under Section 4 of the Competition Act, 2002, and that the evidence did not establish anti-competitive foreclosure or refusal to supply.

30 Jun 2025

The case arises from an information filed by Kapoor Glass India Pvt. Ltd. on 25 May 2010 under Section 19 of the Competition Act, 2002, alleging that ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Considers Whether Dearness Allowance is a Fundamental Right, Hears Appeals Against High Court Mandate to Pay Central Rates. High Court's declaration of Dearness Allowance under Article 21 and direction for parity with Central Government employees challenged by State.

1 Jan 1970

The State of West Bengal filed appeals by special leave challenging the orders of the High Court at Calcutta dated 20th May 2022 and 22nd September 20...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes GST Provisional Attachment Order for Violation of Natural Justice. Attachment of Bank Accounts and Property Without Prior Hearing Held Invalid Under Section 79(1)(c) of CGST Act, 2017.

26 Mar 2026

The petitioner, Navin Vishwanathan, proprietor of M/s. Oriental Facility, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 300A of the Constitution of Ind...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Blocking of Input Tax Credit Under Rule 86-A of CGST/MGST Rules for Violation of Natural Justice. Prior Hearing Mandated Before Blocking Credit Under Rule 86-A.

17 Oct 2023

The petitioner, Ashapura Steel Metal, through its proprietor Velaram Viraji Choudhary, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in GST Provisional Attachment Case, Reversing High Court's Dismissal on Maintainability Grounds. The High Court Erred in Dismissing Writ Petition Solely Due to Alternative Remedy Under Section 107 of the Himachal Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, Without Examining Merits of Provisional Attachment Orders Under Section 83.

20 Apr 2021

The appeal arose from a judgment dated 1 January 2021 by the High Court of Himachal Pradesh, which dismissed a writ petition under Article 226 of the ...

11 12 13 14 15

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)