Bombay High Court Delivers Oral Judgment in Land Acquisition Writ Petition. The Court considered submissions of learned counsel for the parties.
25 Apr 2025...
Search Results for "deemed acquisition lapsed"
350 result(s) found
Found 350 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Lapse of Reservation Under Section 127 MRTP Act — Failure to Acquire Land Within 10 Years. Petitioners' land reserved for school purposes not acquired despite notice; court declares reservation lapsed and directs publication of notification.
24 Feb 2025The petitioners, owners of land bearing Gat No. 105/2+3 at Village Bale, Solapur, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking ...
- 776
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Review Applications in Land Acquisition Cases Based on Overruled Precedent. Court held review maintainable under Article 137 of Constitution of India as subsequent Constitution Bench decision in Indore Development Authority overruled earlier Pune Municipal Corporation decision, altering law and providing sufficient reason for review, with matters restored for fresh consideration on merits.
17 Mar 2023The Supreme Court dealt with a group of review applications filed by the Government of NCT of Delhi and Delhi Development Authority under Article 137 ...
- 377
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows DDA and Govt. of NCT of Delhi Appeals in Land Acquisition Lapse Case — Acquisition Not Deemed Lapsed Under Section 24(2) of Act, 2013 When Possession Taken but Compensation Not Paid. Possession Taken on 26.05.1998 Vests Land in State; No Divesting Under Section 24(2) as per Indore Development Authority v. Manoharlal.
15 Dec 2022The case involves appeals by the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) and the Government of NCT of Delhi against a judgment of the Delhi High Court. The ...
- 161
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Lapsation of Land Reservations Under MRTP Act — Failure to Acquire Land Within Ten Years Results in Deemed Lapse. Reservation for Public Offices and Truck Terminal on Petitioner's Land Held Lapsed as No Acquisition Proceedings Were Initiated Within Statutory Period Under Section 127 of MRTP Act, 1966.
11 Aug 2021The petitioner, Sakharam Mahadev Jadhav, was the owner of lands bearing Survey No.69/1 and 69/2/1 situated at Village Belavali, Taluka Ambarnath, Dist...
- 24
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Demolition Notice for Violation of Natural Justice under MRTP Act. Demolition Notice Quashed as Issued Without Show Cause Notice or Hearing.
24 Jan 2020The petitioners, five individuals, filed a writ petition challenging a demolition notice issued by the Municipal Council, Kinwat, under Section 52 of ...
- 52
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Land Acquisition Lapse Claim Under Section 24(2) of RFCTLARR Act, 2013 — Compensation Deposited in Court Constitutes Valid Payment. Legal Heirs Cannot Claim Lapse After Compensation Deposited in Court on Award Date.
20 Dec 2016The petitioners, claiming to be legal heirs of late Narayan Aditwar Patil, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seekin...
- 48
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in Land Acquisition Case Due to Non-Communication of Award Under Section 12(2) of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Proceedings Lapse Under Section 24(2) of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 as Award Not Communicated Before New Act Came Into Force.
4 Aug 2016The petitioners, Jitesh Bhaiyalal Sahu and Rashmi Jitesh Sahu, owned 1.95 hectares of land in Mouza Morangana, Amravati. The State initiated acquisiti...
- 86
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Reservation on Land Due to Mapping Error and Non-Acquisition. The court quashed the reservation on the petitioner's land as the reservation chart showed a different survey number and no acquisition steps were taken for decades.
16 Jan 2014The petitioner, an agriculturist aged 77, is a joint owner of agricultural land Gat No. 933 (Old Survey No. 212/1) admeasuring 15R. In 1981, responden...
- 75
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for De-reservation of Land Reserved for High School and Playground in Development Plan. Petitioners failed to show that reservation had lapsed under Section 127 of MRTP Act, 1966 as no notice under Section 127 was issued.
21 Sep 2005The petitioners, owners of land bearing Survey No.99 (now 99-A) and site Nos.142 and 145 at Malegaon, District Nasik, filed a writ petition seeking de...
- 136
