Search Results for "debate prohibition"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...

Search Results for "debate prohibition"

143 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 143 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Single Judge Can Hear Petitions Under Article 226/227 Against Any Judicial/Quasi-Judicial Order, Not Limited to Listed Acts. The Full Bench resolves the conflict and clarifies that Rule 18 of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960 is procedural and does not restrict the Single Judge's jurisdiction to specific Acts.

4 Oct 2023

The case arose from a writ petition filed by M/s. Magnum Opus IT Consulting Pvt. Ltd. under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, challenging an o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Compassionate Appointment Despite Third Child Born After Cut-off Date — Government Resolution Clause E Held Inapplicable to Children Born Before 31.12.2001. The court interpreted Clause E of the Government Resolution dated 28.03.2001 as prospective, not disqualifying families with a third child born before 31.12.2001.

27 Jul 2023

The petitioners, Sunita Gaikwad (widow) and Ashish Gaikwad (son), sought compassionate appointment after the death of Dinesh Gaikwad, an employee of Z...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Cancellation of Tender for Textile Mill Land Sale. Petitioner failed to demonstrate any legal right to compel conclusion of sale after tender was cancelled due to non-compliance with terms.

25 Jan 2021

The petitioner, M/s Drushti Engineers & Developers, a partnership firm, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit, Remands for Fresh Consideration on Limitation. The appellate court's dismissal of suit as barred by limitation was set aside as it failed to consider the plaintiff's case that refusal occurred on 30 March 1972, not 31 March 1972.

13 Nov 2019

The case involves a second appeal filed by the original plaintiff (now represented by legal heirs) against the judgment of the District Court, Solapur...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Majority Arbitral Award in Maritime Demurrage Dispute — Claim Time-Barred Under Charterparty Clause 24. The court upheld the majority arbitrators' finding that the demurrage claim was received beyond the 45-day period stipulated in clause 24 of the Tanker Voyage Charterparty, and thus the claim was time-barred.

4 Jan 2012

The petitioner, Axios Navigation Co. Ltd., a shipowner, challenged a majority arbitral award dated 18 August 2008 passed by a three-member Arbitral Tr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Temporary Injunction in Suit Challenging Compromise Decree. Interpretation of Kachhi Properties Judgment Clarified: No Automatic Stay of Execution Proceedings Upon Filing of Suit for Declaration that Decree is Void.

8 Apr 2011

The Bombay High Court heard two appeals from orders rejecting temporary injunction applications. The first appeal (AO 884/2010) challenged an order da...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Disqualification from Tender for Violation of Non-Compete Clause. Clause 8.31 of Licence Agreement Between GTI and JNPT Prohibited Promoters from Bidding for Competing Projects, and Subsequent Government Policy Could Not Be Read into Existing Contract.

10 Mar 2010

The petitioner, APM Terminals B.V., a Dutch company, along with Container Corporation of India Ltd (CONCOR), formed a joint venture company called Gat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Interest on Delayed Payment of Labour Court Award Under Section 33-C(2) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 — Interest Act, 1978 and Article 226 of Constitution Invoked to Prevent Miscarriage of Justice.

4 Feb 2010

The petitioner, Mrs. Prabhavati Ramgarib B., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the order of the Central...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Interest on Delayed Payment of Labour Court Award Under Section 33-C(2) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Labour Court has power to award interest for period between date of award and actual payment to prevent miscarriage of justice.

4 Feb 2010

The petitioner, Mrs. Prabhavati Ramgarib B., filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal and Labour Cour...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Directors in Pan Masala Ban Case — No Offence Under Section 328 IPC. Pan Masala Not a 'Poison' or 'Noxious Substance' Despite Ban Under Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954.

28 Oct 2005

The petitioners, Rajiv Kumar Gupta, Piyush Kumar Gupta, and Satyanarayan Gupta, were directors of Dharampal Satyapal Limited, a company manufacturing ...

11 12 13 14 15

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)