Search Results for "customs officers"

829 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 829 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses FCI's Appeal in Customs Duty Refund Case — Limitation for Appeal Under Section 128 Cannot Be Condoned. Import of Section 129A to condone delay in first appeal under Section 128 is impermissible as Customs Act is a complete code.

The Food Corporation of India (FCI) filed a Civil Miscellaneous Appeal under Section 130(1) of the Customs Act, 1962 read with Section 104 of CPC, cha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in CBI Case Due to Settlement Commission Immunity — Criminal Conspiracy and Corruption Charges Quashed Against Company Granted Immunity Under Central Excise Act, 1944 and Customs Act, 1962.

The appellant, Baccarose Perfumes and Beauty Products Pvt. Ltd., a company engaged in manufacturing and exporting cosmetics from a unit in Kandla Spec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Retrospective Amendment to Foreign Trade Policy and Customs Notification. Court Holds That Importers Have No Vested Right in Export Obligation Period and Retrospective Amendment Is Valid to Prevent Misuse of Duty Exemption Scheme.

The Bombay High Court dismissed two writ petitions challenging the validity of Notification No.2(RE 2013)/2009-14 dated 18th April 2013, which retrosp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Validation of DRI Officers' Jurisdiction. Establishing the authority of DRI officers as proper officers under Section 28 of the Customs Act, 1962.

The Bombay High Court disposed of the writ petition filed by Idea Cellular Ltd., challenging the jurisdiction of Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Petition of IRS Officer Challenging Disciplinary Proceedings in Contraband Silver Seizure Case. Petitioner's claim of prior information from informer disbelieved; charge of malafide intention to appropriate reward upheld.

The petitioner, D.S. Karant, a 1969 batch Indian Revenue Service officer, was posted as Additional Commissioner at Mangalore. He claimed to have recei...