Search Results for "cooperative housing society"

975 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 975 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Expulsion from Cooperative Society Membership. Expulsion Order Set Aside for Violation of Natural Justice as No Show Cause Notice or Hearing Was Given to the Member Under Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act.

The petitioner, a member of respondent no.4-Society registered under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, was expelled from membership by the M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition in Cooperative Housing Society Dispute — Directs Registration of Transfer of Shares and Issuance of Share Certificates. Failure to Register Transfer of Shares by Managing Committee Violates Bye-Laws and Cooperative Societies Act, 1960.

The petitioners, five members of Jal Ratan Deep CHS Ltd., a cooperative housing society in Mumbai, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Cons...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals in Cooperative Society Dispute, Sets Aside Limitation Bar. Correction Deed Does Not Extend Limitation for Challenging Original Sale Deed Under Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960.

The case involves two Letters Patent Appeals filed by Santosh Rani Arora and Dharmeshkumar Arora against the order of a learned Single Judge of the Bo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition in Cooperative Society Dispute — Upholds Ownership Claim Based on Possession and Payment of Consideration. Transfer of Shares and Interest in Favour of Petitioner Valid Under Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960.

The petitioner, Ashok s/o Bapurao Kadam, filed a dispute before the Cooperative Judge, Nanded, seeking a declaration of ownership and possession of a ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to SRA Order in Slum Rehabilitation Scheme. CEO's Direction to Process Letter of Intent Upheld as 70% Consent of Eligible Members Was Validly Obtained Under DCR 33(10).

The case involves a slum rehabilitation scheme under DCR 33(10) of the Development Control Regulations for Greater Mumbai. The petitioners, Lokhandwal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Unauthorized Occupants Challenging Redevelopment Approval Under DCR 33(7) — Encroachers Lack Locus Standi to Challenge Approval Granted to Cooperative Society of Municipal Tenants.

The case involves a writ petition filed by Pramod Vithal Salgaonkar, the Chief Promoter of Shree Dattaguru CHS (Prop), and another petitioner, challen...