Search Results for "compromise terms"

1391 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1391 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Tenant's Revision Against Eviction Order in Execution Proceedings — Compromise Decree Not Violated as Lease Deed Was Not Part of Decree. Executing Court Cannot Go Beyond Decree Terms; Alleged Violation of Lease Deed Not Enforceable in Execution Under Section 115 CPC.

The petitioner, Smt. R. Sharmila, was a tenant in a property owned by the respondent, B. Devakumar. The respondent filed O.S.No.755/2011 for ejectment...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Lok Adalat Compromise Decree in Partition Suit: Third Party Not Permitted to Invoke Article 226 Against Lok Adalat Award. Writ Remedy Not Available to Strangers to Decree; Proper Recourse Is to File a Separate Suit for Declaration and Partition.

The writ petition was filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by five individuals claiming to be members of the same family as t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Notice of Motion to Set Aside Consent Decree in Co-operative Society Dispute; Finds Fraud and Lack of Authority. Consent Decree Vitiated by Dual Representation of Husband-Wife and Absence of Society's Authorization Under Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960.

This notice of motion sought to set aside a consent decree dated 19 April 1993 and all subsequent amendments and the conveyance executed in pursuance ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Capital Gains Tax Case — Transfer of Property Not Completed Under Section 2(47)(v) of Income Tax Act, 1961. Agreement to Sell and Power of Attorney Did Not Confer Possession or Part Performance Under Section 53A of Transfer of Property Act, 1882.

The appellant-assessee, M/s Seshasayee Steels P. Ltd., entered into an agreement to sell on 15.05.1998 with Vijay Santhi Builders Ltd. for sale of lan...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sanctions Scheme of Arrangement in Company Petition for Revival of Sick Pharmaceutical Company. Scheme under Section 391 of Companies Act, 1956, Approved Involving Settlement of Secured Creditors' Dues through Cash and Securities.

The Pharmaceutical Products of India Limited (PPIL), a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, filed two company petitions under Section 3...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Gift Dispute — Father's Power to Gift Ancestral Property Upheld. Compromise Decree Based on Gift Not Challenged, First Appellate Court Erred in Considering Irrelevant Factors.

The appellant, Mubarak S/o Badesab Mulla, filed Regular Civil Suit No.103 of 2007 seeking a declaration of ownership and perpetual injunction regardin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Against Restoration of Possession in Execution Proceedings — Compromise Decree Set Aside Without Notice to Decree Holder Violates Natural Justice. Order XXI Rule 99 CPC Application Cannot Be Decided Without Hearing the Decree Holder.

The petitioner, Smt. Leelavathi, filed a civil revision petition under Section 18 of the Karnataka Small Causes Courts Act, 1964, challenging an order...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Hears Regular First Appeals Against Dismissal of Suits on Admissions Under Order XII Rule 6 CPC in Family Partition Dispute. Appeals Arise from Dispute Over Family Arrangement Documents and Partition of Ancestral Agricultural Lands.

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru delivered a common judgment in two regular first appeals filed by the same appellant, M.R. Raghuram, against ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition Against Order Holding Partition Suit Maintainable Despite Earlier Compromise Decree. Court Rules That a Compromise Decree Does Not Bar a Fresh Suit for Partition When the Decree Was Not Acted Upon and the Parties Continued in Joint Possession.

The petitioner, defendant No.1 in O.S.No.114/2017, filed a revision petition under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) challenging ...