ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 4 OF 1986
12 Apr 2013The petition filed under sections 30 and 33 of the Arbitration Act, 1940, sought to challenge an interim award and certain directions issued by the so...
Search Results for "compensation under 2013 Act"
3707 result(s) found
Found 3707 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Arbitration Appeal Against Order Setting Aside Arbitral Award in Family Business Dispute. Dispute Centers on Inclusion of Agricultural Lands Held by Individual Family Members in Family Asset Separation Process.
14 Jun 2013The appeal arose from a family dispute within the Malhotra family of Pune, who owned and controlled several businesses including Weikfield Products Co...
- 11
High Court
Madras High Court Dismisses Challenge to Land Acquisition Under NH Act for Highway Widening — Removal of Difficulties Order 2015 Upheld. NH Act, 1956 prevails over 2013 Act; technical approval not a condition precedent for Section 3-A notification.
30 Jan 2025The judgment concerns three writ petitions filed by landowners challenging the land acquisition proceedings for the four-laning of National Highway 74...
- 104
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Expressway Land Acquisition Compensation Process; Dismisses Farmers’ Writ Petitions
17 Feb 2026The petitions were filed by farmers whose lands were acquired for the Jalna–Nanded Super Express Highway project. The landowners challenged the ...
- 278
High Court
- 58
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers GST Liability on Royalty Payments to Court Receiver in Commercial Property Dispute. The Court Examines Whether Payments to a Court Receiver Under Order XL CPC Constitute Taxable Supply Under the CGST Act, 2017 and Whether GST Should be Discharged via Reverse Charge Mechanism.
13 Sep 2019The Bombay High Court, in a Court Receiver's Report arising from a commercial suit for recovery of possession of three shops used as a restaurant, exa...
- 16
High Court
High Court Rejects Remand Request in Land Acquisition Enhancement Appeal — Acquiring Body's Failure to File Written Statement After Being Allowed to Participate Does Not Warrant Remand. The Court Relied on the Principle That Mere Technicalities Cannot Defeat the Ends of Justice When the Party Had Opportunity to Cross-Examine Witnesses.
2 Feb 2016The first appeal was filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, by the acquiring body, Maharashtra State Power Generation Co. ...
- 17
High Court
- 46
High Court
- 54
