Search Results for "bootleggers"

323 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 323 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Unexplained Delay in Considering Representation. Preventive Detention Order Set Aside as State Failed to Explain Delay of Over 100 Days in Disposing Detenu's Representation, Violating Article 22(5) of Constitution.

The petitioner, Devendra Ramlal Bidlan, was detained under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug Offender...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Non-Furnishing of Vital Documents. Failure to provide injury certificates of all injured persons in a solitary incident vitiates subjective satisfaction of detaining authority.

The petitioner, Monty Bahadur Karotiya, challenged his detention order dated 02.02.2022 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Thane City under Section...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Detention Under MPDA Act — In-Camera Statements Verified by Authorized Officer Sufficient. Detention order under Section 3(2) of MPDA Act upheld as statements of confidential witnesses were verified by Assistant Commissioner of Police and found genuine.

The petitioner, Rohit @ Karan s/o Purshottam Naukariya, was detained by an order dated 22/12/2021 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Nagpur City (r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Material to Show Public Order Disturbance. Detention of alleged bootlegger set aside as activities related to illicit liquor did not affect public order but only law and order.

The petitioner, Jaywanta s/o Gangaram Pawar, was detained under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug-off...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition in MPDA Act Preventive Detention Case Due to Non-Arrest in Core Crimes. Non-arrest in predicate offences renders preventive detention unjustified as ordinary law control measures were adequate.

The petitioner, Hanif Karim Laluwale, challenged a preventive detention order passed under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Sluml...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order in MPDA Case Due to Non-Application of Mind. Court holds that the detaining authority failed to consider the detenue's bail status and the availability of alternative remedies under ordinary law, rendering the detention order invalid.

The petitioner, Ram Raju @ Jatalya Umap, challenged a preventive detention order passed by the Commissioner of Police, Pune, under Section 3(2) of the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Unexplained Delay of 5 Months. Failure to Comply with Section 3(3) Requirement of Forthwith Approval and Delay in Considering Representation Renders Detention Invalid.

The petitioner, Sachin Parshuram Mane, challenged an order of detention dated 30.06.2021 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Pune City under Section...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Inordinate Delay in Considering Representation. Preventive Detention Order Set Aside as Representation Remained Unattended for Over Three Months, Violating Constitutional Safeguard Under Article 22(5).

The petitioner, Premchand @ Babu Punjabi @ Tatu Manohar Dhakani, was detained under Section 3 of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of...