Search Results for "arbitrators jurisdiction"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "arbitrators jurisdiction"

790 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 790 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Considers Appeal Against Order Setting Aside Arbitral Award in Berth Reservation Dispute. Court Examines Whether the Claim Was Barred by Limitation and Whether the Award Was Patently Illegal Under Sections 34 and 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

13 Mar 2026

The judgment of the Madras High Court in OSA (CAD) No. 39 of 2021 involved an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, a...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Extension of Arbitrator's Mandate Under Section 29A(5) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Even After Award Rendered Beyond Statutory Time Limit -- Court Reverses High Court Decision Setting Aside Award

3 Feb 2026

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and set aside the High Court's orders, holding that a court can entertain an application under Section 29A(5) of ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Central Organisation for Railway Electrification Against Appointment of Independent Arbitrator in Contract Dispute. Statutory Ineligibility Under Section 12(5) of Arbitration Act Prevents Serving and Retired Railway Officers from Acting as Arbitrators Despite Contractual Clause.

17 Dec 2019

The appellant, Central Organisation for Railway Electrification, awarded a work contract to the respondent, a joint venture company, on 20.09.2010. Th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines Validity of Arbitration Reference and Anti-Suit Injunction in Wind Turbine Technology Licensing Dispute. The Core Issue Revolves Around Whether an Unincorporated IPLA Constitutes a Binding Arbitration Agreement Under Section 45 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

5 Oct 2012

The dispute arose from a joint venture between Enercon (India) Ltd. and its directors (Petitioners) and Enercon GmbH and Wobben Properties GmbH (Respo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award in Construction Dispute — No Grounds for Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court held that the arbitral tribunal's interpretation of contractual clauses was plausible and not patently illegal.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation Ltd., entered into a contract with the respondent, Jai Laxmi Constructions Engineers An...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Upholding Demurrage Claim. Interpretation of Clause 10(v) of Coal Supply Contract as Creating Primary Liability, Not Indemnity, and Binding Effect of Laytime Statement When No Disagreement Raised Within 30 Days Upheld.

21 Dec 2016

The dispute arose out of a contract dated 18 September 1999 between Ultratech Cement Ltd. (appellant, formerly Larsen & Toubro Ltd.) and Sunfield Reso...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Interprets Court's Power Under Section 9 of Arbitration Act Post-Tribunal Constitution. The Court Held That Courts Can Entertain Section 9 Applications After Tribunal Constitution But Must Examine Efficacy of Section 17 Remedy, with 'Entertain' Encompassing Entire Adjudication Process Under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

14 Sep 2021

The dispute arose from a Cargo Handling Agreement between the parties, containing an arbitration clause. The appellant invoked arbitration via a notic...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Section 11 Application to Appoint Arbitrator in Insurance Dispute — Insurer's Failure to Appoint Arbitrator Leads to Court Intervention. The court held that the respondent's failure to appoint its arbitrator under the arbitration clause in the terrorism insurance policy entitled the applicant to seek appointment by the court under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

8 May 2013

The applicant, Essar Steel India Limited, filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Government Contract Dispute Despite Non-Exhaustion of Pre-Arbitration Procedure. Party Autonomy and Minimal Judicial Intervention Upheld Under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

28 Nov 2025

The appellant, Hindustan Construction Company Ltd., was awarded a contract by the respondent, Bihar Rajya Pul Nirman Nigam Ltd. (BRPNNL), on 04.03.201...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Challenge to Majority Arbitral Award in Insurance Dispute — JSW Steel Ltd. v. ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company Ltd. — Challenge to Rejection of Claims Under Fire, Marine, and Business Interruption Policies Dismissed as No Patent Illegality Found.

19 Dec 2018

The Petitioner, JSW Steel Ltd., engaged in steel manufacturing, had insured its plant at Toranagallu, Karnataka, under five insurance policies issued ...

11 12 13 14 15

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)