Search Results for "arbitrator misconduct"

171 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 171 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Industrial Tribunal's Order for Payment of Subsistence Allowance to Suspended Railway Employee. Employer's Failure to Pay Subsistence Allowance During Suspension Period Renders Subsequent Disciplinary Proceedings Invalid.

The Union of India, through the Chief Workshop Manager of Central Railway, Parel, Mumbai, filed two writ petitions challenging orders of the Central G...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Labour Court Award of Reinstatement with Backwages in Industrial Dispute — Employer's Challenge Dismissed for Lack of Merit. Termination of Workman Found Illegal as Domestic Inquiry Was Not Held and Employer Failed to Prove Misconduct.

The petitioner, M/s TTK Healthcare Ltd, an employer engaged in the manufacture of ready-to-eat food products, challenged the award dated 28.02.2014 pa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order for Reinstatement with Full Back Wages. Termination of Workmen Held to Be Colourable Exercise of Employer's Rights and Victimization Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The petitioner, Anglo French Drugs & Industries Ltd., challenged an order of the Industrial Court dated 11th April 2002, which allowed a revision appl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Workman to Avail Services of Legal Practitioner in Domestic Inquiry - Right to Representation Under Industrial Disputes Act. The court held that refusal to permit legal representation violates principles of natural justice.

The petitioner, Ajit Bhagwan Sawant, a workman employed by M/s. Parveen Industries Pvt. Ltd., was subjected to a domestic inquiry by the employer. The...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Quashes Direction for De Novo Enquiry Against Retired Co-operative Bank Employee. Post-Retirement Disciplinary Proceedings Not Permissible Under Rule 18(1) of Karnataka Co-operative Societies Rules, 1960.

The petitioner, Bahubali, served as Chief Executive Officer of Vikas Urban Co-operative Bank Ltd. from 01.05.1997. He was dismissed from service on 30...