Search Results for "absolute privilege"

298 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 298 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Furlough for Life Convict in Murder Case Despite Vague Witness Threat Claims. Furlough is a right, not a privilege, under the Maharashtra Prisons (Bombay Furlough and Parole) Rules, 1959, and rejection based on general apprehension is unsustainable.

The petitioner, Archana Singh, wife of convict Virendra Thakur, filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the rejection ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Furlough Leave to Life Convict Despite Adverse Police Report and Pending Case. Holds that Furlough is a Right, Not a Privilege, and Rejection Must Be Based on Valid Grounds Under Prison Rules.

The petitioner, Dinesh s/o Ashokrao Athawale, was convicted in Sessions Trial No.302/2014 for offences under Sections 302, 147, 148, 149, and 307 of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Seizure of Vehicles Under Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949 — Held That Seizure Without Notice and Hearing Violates Principles of Natural Justice and Section 105 of the Act Requires Show-Cause Notice Before Confiscation.

The judgment concerns a batch of writ petitions filed by owners of vehicles that were seized by the State Excise Department under Section 105 of the M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Blacklisting of Supplier by Central Bank of India for Non-Supply Due to Force Majeure. Natural Calamity in Thailand Constitutes Force Majeure Excusing Performance Under Contract Law Principles.

The petitioner, M/s. Acer India (Pvt.) Ltd., a private limited company engaged in supplying computer software and hardware, challenged its blacklistin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Interest Demand on CLIII License Renewal Fee. Excise Department Cannot Levy Interest Without Specific Statutory Provision Under Maharashtra Excise Act, 2002 or Bombay Foreign Liquor Rules, 1953.

The petitioners, Maheshprasad Dwarkadas Jaiswal and Rajeshwar Dwarkadas Jaiswal, are CLIII license holders for a liquor shop at Shahabazar, Aurangabad...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Excise Licence Case — Policy Restriction on Multiple FLII Licences Upheld. Refusal to Renew Second Foreign Liquor Licence Under Section 137(2) of Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949, Upheld as Consistent with Government Policy and Not Discriminatory.

The appellant, Nandkishor Shivprasad Jaiswal, filed a Letters Patent Appeal against the judgment of a Single Judge dismissing his Writ Petition No. 16...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Disqualification from Tender for Violation of Non-Compete Clause. Clause 8.31 of Licence Agreement Between GTI and JNPT Prohibited Promoters from Bidding for Competing Projects, and Subsequent Government Policy Could Not Be Read into Existing Contract.

The petitioner, APM Terminals B.V., a Dutch company, along with Container Corporation of India Ltd (CONCOR), formed a joint venture company called Gat...