Search Results for "Undisputed Refund"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Undisputed Refund"

311 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 311 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Recovery of Excess Payment from Retired Municipal Employee — Upgradation Granted After 7 Years Service Cannot Be Revised Retrospectively Without Notice. Recovery of Rs.4,98,368/- from Retired Auxiliary Midwife Nurse Set Aside as Violative of Natural Justice and Employer's Mistake.

16 Dec 2025

The petitioner, Kalpana Chandrakant Gorhe, was appointed as an Auxiliary Midwife Nurse on 2 November 1992 with the Aurangabad Municipal Corporation an...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Interim Injunction in Unfair Labour Practice Complaint. Industrial Court's Order Restraining Sale of Assets Upheld as Within Jurisdiction Under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

29 Sep 2023

The petitioners, Esselworld Leisure Pvt. Ltd. (a private limited company operating a ride and amusement park, water kingdom, and bird park) along with...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Order in MVAT Case Due to Limitation and Lack of Natural Justice. Inter-State Stock Transfer Not a Sale Under MVAT Act, 2002; Reassessment Beyond 4-Year Limitation Period Invalid.

29 Apr 2022

The petitioner, M/s. United Spirits Limited, a company engaged in the manufacture and sale of alcoholic beverages, filed a writ petition challenging a...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition in Property Tax Dispute — Appeal Under Section 113(3) of KMC Act Not Maintainable Against Tax Demand Notice. Court holds that a notice demanding property tax is not a 'decision or order' appealable under Section 113(3) of the Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976.

15 Jan 2021

The revision petition was filed by the petitioner, Ms. Shobha, against the order dated 17.07.2010 passed in M.A.No.36/2007 by the I-Additional Distric...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Sets Aside Injunction in Specific Performance Suit Due to Lack of Prima Facie Case and Delay. The Court held that the plaintiff failed to establish a strong prima facie case of a concluded contract under the Specific Relief Act, 1963, and the unexplained delay of over 7 months in filing the suit weighed against grant of temporary injunction.

6 Jan 2020

The Supreme Court of India heard appeals against a common order of the Gujarat High Court affirming a temporary injunction granted by the trial court ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Bank Recovery Suit Due to Failure to Prove Debt and Improper Service of Notice Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The court held that the plaintiff bank failed to prove the debt and liability of the defendant, and the notice under Section 138 was not properly served, thus the suit for recovery was not maintainable.

30 Aug 2019

The appellant, K. Ravindra Shetty, was the defendant in a suit filed by Vijaya Bank for recovery of Rs. 3,20,835.20 with interest. The bank claimed th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Property Dispute Over Flat Allotment and Possession. Court upholds concurrent findings that appellants failed to prove title or possession, and that the suit was not barred by limitation or the Cooperative Societies Act.

12 Oct 2018

The case involves a second appeal by original defendant nos. 7 and 8 (appellants) against the judgment and decree of the District Court, Pune, which c...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses State's Appeals in VAT Input Tax Credit Dispute — Reassessment Notices Issued Beyond Limitation Period Are Invalid. The court held that reassessment under Section 39(1) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 must be completed within four years from the end of the relevant tax period, and notices issued after that period are barred by limitation.

31 Aug 2018

The case involves multiple writ appeals filed by the State of Karnataka against orders of a single judge quashing reassessment notices issued under Se...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Illegal Electricity Demand by Government of Goa. Demand of Rs. 48,50,360/- for Electricity Charges from Successor Company Set Aside as Without Authority of Law Under Electricity Act, 1910 and Indian Contract Act, 1872.

21 Jul 2017

The appellants, Shri Ambey Forging Pvt. Ltd. and its director Pawan Lila, filed an appeal against the judgment and decree dated 31/03/2007 of the Ad h...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Petition in Central Excise Rebate Case — By-Product Export Rebate Allowed. Input Credit Adjustment Permitted Under CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 for Duty Paid on Inputs Used in Manufacture of Final Product, Even if By-Product is Not Manufactured.

6 Apr 2011

The Union of India, through the Commissioner of Central Excise, Raigad, filed a writ petition challenging an order of the Joint Secretary (Revision Ap...

11 12 13 14 15

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)