Search Results for "Social Justice and Special Assistance Department"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...

Search Results for "Social Justice and Special Assistance Department"

644 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 644 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Bombay hears writ petition filed by State of Maharashtra against multiple respondents including industrial companies and individuals concerning urban development and environmental matters in Mahul Village, Chembur. The case involves allegations of non-compliance with environmental norms and urban development regulations by industrial units and authorities.

1 Jan 1970

The writ petition, being Writ Petition No. 14102 of 2018 along with connected civil application and original side writ petition, was filed by the Stat...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Writ Petition (PIL) – Cause Title Only. No substantive judgment text provided.

21 Jun 2016

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Delivers Judgment in Public Interest Litigation No. 47 of 2013 Regarding Change of Land Use and Allotment. The court examined the validity of modifying user of a plot from public utility to commercial and the subsequent allotment to a trust.

7 Sep 2016

This Public Interest Litigation (PIL) was filed by Citizen Forum For Equality, a registered NGO, challenging the modification of user of a plot in the...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench Hears Group of Writ Petitions by University Employees. No adjudicative details available in the provided text.

1 Jan 1970

...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Disposes of PIL and Writ Petition Challenging FSI Increase in Mumbai Suburbs under MRTP Act. Petitioners Contended Notifications Violated Article 14 and 21 and Amounted to Major Modification Not Permissible under Section 37 of MRTP Act.

10 Jun 2010

This incomplete judgment text of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction, concerns two petitions: Public Interest...

Supreme Court

"Landmark Judgment on Property Rights and Public Welfare in Mumbai" "Balancing property ownership with the collective good under India's constitutional framework."

5 Nov 2024

The Supreme Court examined whether Chapter VIII-A of the MHADA Act aligns with the principles of Article 39(b) of the Indian Constitution, which aims ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Title Dispute Against Government — Holds That Government Cannot Unilaterally Resume Land Without Following Due Process and Payment of Compensation. Court Restores Trial Court Decree Declaring Appellants' Title Based on Valid Sale Deed and Pattadar Passbook, Setting Aside High Court's Reversal.

24 Mar 2025

The case involves a dispute over 3.34 acres of land in Kurnool District, Andhra Pradesh. The appellants claimed title through a chain of transactions ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Multiple Writ Petitions on Land Acquisition Lapsing Under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. The petitions sought declarations that acquisition proceedings under the Bangalore Development Authority Act and Mysore Urban Development Authority Act had lapsed due to non-compliance with Section 24 of the 2013 Act.

10 Mar 2016

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petitions Seeking Declaration of Lapsed Land Acquisition Proceedings Under 2013 Act. Petitioners Claimed Acquisition Lapsed Due to Non-Compliance with Provisions of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.

10 Mar 2016

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Acquitted Accused's Writ Petition for Rs.200 Crore Compensation as Acquittal Does Not Automatic Entitlement. The Court Holds That Compensation Under Article 226 Requires Proof of Malicious Prosecution and Violation of Fundamental Rights, Not Mere Acquittal.

5 May 2017

The present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 was filed by the peti...

11 12 13 14 15

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)