Search Results for "Slum Areas Act"

230 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 230 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds Pending Civil Suits Not a Bar to Deemed Conveyance Under MOFA: Quantum Park CHS v. AHCL-PEL & Ors

The Bombay High Court allowed the writ petition filed by Quantum Park Cooperative Housing Society and quashed the order rejecting its application for ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Interim Application in Waqf Property Dispute — Status Quo Maintained Pending Final Hearing. Court holds that interim protection is necessary to preserve the subject matter of the suit and prevent irreparable loss to the applicants.

The present matter is an interim application filed in a suit pending before the Bombay High Court. The applicants, Masjid and Madarsa Gausiya (a regis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal of Plaintiffs in Tenancy Dispute — Plaintiffs Fail to Prove Tenancy Rights. Court holds that mere possession or payment of rent does not establish tenancy without proof of lawful transfer or succession under the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999.

The case involves a dispute over a room (suit premises) allotted in lieu of an earlier tenanted room in a chawl at Mahim, Mumbai. The plaintiffs, Sulo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals of Tenants Against MHADA in Slum Rehabilitation Disputes — Held That Tenants in Possession Before Cut-Off Date Are Entitled to Rehabilitation Under Section 3(1) of Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971.

The judgment involves multiple appeals filed by tenants against the Maharashtra Housing Area Development Authority (MHADA) concerning slum rehabilitat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Landlord's Restoration Applications in Eviction Disputes Due to Failure to Show Sufficient Cause for Non-Appearance. Order IX Rule 9 CPC Requires Satisfactory Explanation for Absence, Which Was Not Provided.

The judgment pertains to a group of civil applications filed by Lekhraj M. Solanki and Jasoda Lekhraj Solanki, the original plaintiffs, seeking restor...