High Court of Judicature at Bombay Adjudicates Application for Appointment of Arbitrator Under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Dispute Involves a Loan Agreement and Seeks Resolution Through Arbitration.
22 Apr 2025...
Search Results for "Securitization Act"
188 result(s) found
Found 188 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Paschimanchal Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. in Insolvency Case — Holds That Statutory Charge Under Electricity Supply Agreement Survives Liquidation and Must Be Respected Under IBC. The Court ruled that a charge created under Section 53 of the Electricity Act, 2003 read with contractual terms is not extinguished by the moratorium under Section 14 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, and the liquidator must treat the appellant as a secured creditor.
1 Jan 2023The appellant, Paschimanchal Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. (PVVNL), a state electricity distribution company, entered into an electricity supply agreement ...
- 187
High Court
Karnataka High Court Allows Writ Appeal Against Single Judge Order in SARFAESI Act Matter, Remands for Fresh Consideration on Merits. The Division Bench held that the Single Judge erred in dismissing the writ petition solely on the ground of alternative remedy without examining the merits of the case under Section 13(4) of the SARFAESI Act, 2002.
21 Nov 2016The appellant, Karnataka Bank Ltd., filed a writ appeal against an order dated 23-11-2015 passed by a learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No. 33276 ...
- 13
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Bank's Appeal Against High Court's Mandamus to Consider OTS Application. Court Holds That No Writ of Mandamus Can Be Issued to Direct a Bank to Grant One Time Settlement Benefit Under Article 226 of the Constitution.
15 Dec 2021The present appeal arises from a judgment of the Allahabad High Court which, in exercise of powers under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, iss...
- 363
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Arrest Warrant Against Managing Director in Recovery Certificate Proceedings Under MRTU & PULP Act — Personal Liability Not Established. Director Cannot Be Arrested for Company's Dues Without Lifting Corporate Veil or Establishing Personal Liability Under Sections 50-52 of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.
2 Aug 2018The petitioner, Madhusudan Zumbarlal Sarda, was the Managing Director of Sarda Fashions Ltd. (later Sarda Information Technology Ltd.). Respondent Nos...
- 105
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Petition in Execution Proceedings — Attachment of Amount Deposited in Another Suit Not Permissible Without Proper Procedure Under Order 21 Rule 46 CPC. Decree holder cannot bypass execution procedure by seeking attachment of a sum deposited in a different suit under Section 151 CPC without following Order 21 Rule 46 CPC.
19 Jul 2024The petitioner, Smt. Sarasamma C., filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 21.01.2023 passed ...
- 208
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Section 11 Application for Appointment of Sole Arbitrator in Loan Dispute. Court Appoints Sole Arbitrator Under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Due to Respondent's Failure to Appoint Arbitrator.
10 Oct 2025The applicant, Mangal Credit and Fincorp Limited, a public limited company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, filed an application under Sect...
- 105
High Court
Karnataka High Court Adjudicates Writ Petitions Challenging Mandatory Pre-Deposit under Section 35F of Central Excise Act, 1944. The court examined whether the mandatory deposit requirement violated Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 265 of the Constitution of India.
7 Oct 2015The High Court of Karnataka heard a batch of writ petitions filed by several assessees, including Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd., Prestige Garde...
- 43
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Prohibitory Order Against Contractor in EPF Recovery Proceedings — Third Party Debtor Cannot Be Restrained Without Proper Adjudication Under Section 8G of EPF Act. The court held that a prohibitory order under Section 8G of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 requires prior determination of the debt owed by the third party to the employer, and cannot be issued solely on the basis of a recovery certificate against the employer.
18 Nov 2025The petitioner, B.T. Kadlag Constructions, a private limited company, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging...
- 78
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging DRT Orders on Limitation Act Applicability to RDDBFI Act Appeals. Court Holds Section 5 of Limitation Act Applies to Appeals Under Section 30 of RDDBFI Act, Rejecting Petitioners' Argument That Special Statute Excludes Limitation Act.
13 Oct 2011The petitioners, owners of apartments in Jupiter Complex, Nagpur, challenged orders of the Debts Recovery Tribunal (DRT) and Debts Recovery Appellate ...
- 138
