Search Results for "Section 30(1)"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Section 30(1)"

679 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 679 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeals in Service Tax on Lottery Tickets Case — Holds That Service Tax on Promotion, Marketing, and Sale of Lottery Tickets Is Within Parliament's Competence Under Entry 97 List I Read With Article 248 of the Constitution, and Not Exclusively Within State's Domain Under Entry 62 List II. The Court upheld the constitutional validity of amendments to the Finance Act, 1994 levying service tax on services related to lotteries, reversing the Sikkim High Court's decision.

3 Mar 2025

The Supreme Court, in a batch of appeals led by Union of India v. Future Gaming Solutions Pvt. Ltd., considered the constitutional validity of amendme...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Cooperative Court Order in Society Dispute — Upholds Jurisdiction of Cooperative Court Over Disputes Between Society and Members Under MCS Act, 1960. The court held that the dispute regarding common amenities and parking spaces between a cooperative housing society and its members is exclusively triable by the Cooperative Court under Section 91 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960, and civil court jurisdiction is barred under Section 163.

6 Dec 2023

The petitioners, Meru Heights Co-operative Housing Society Limited and its members, filed a writ petition challenging an order of the Cooperative Cour...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Cooperative Court Order in Housing Society Dispute — Upholds Jurisdiction of Cooperative Court Over Disputes Between Society and Members Under Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. The court held that any dispute touching the business of a cooperative society between the society and its members falls within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Cooperative Court under Section 91 of the MCS Act, and civil courts are barred under Section 163.

6 Dec 2023

The petitioners, Meru Heights Co-operative Housing Society Limited and its members, filed a writ petition challenging an order of the Cooperative Cour...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Permanent Lok Adalat's Jurisdiction in Service Dispute. The Court held that the dispute concerning recovery of excess payment from pension and gratuity of a retired employee of Maharashtra Jeevan Pradhikaran relates to a public utility service under Section 22A(b) of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987, and the Permanent Lok Adalat has jurisdiction.

10 Aug 2022

The Petitioner, the Chief Administrative Officer of Maharashtra Jeevan Pradhikaran, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 29 June 2019 pas...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Reduces Compensation Due to Lack of Proof of Income and Negligence. Claimant failed to establish monthly income and contributory negligence was not considered by Tribunal.

27 Feb 2020

The appellant, National Insurance Co. Ltd., filed an appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, challenging the judgment and award date...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Illegal Demolition by Municipal Corporation Without Due Process — Directions Issued for Reconstruction or Compensation. Demolition of structure without notice violates principles of natural justice and guidelines under Section 351 of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888.

26 Mar 2018

The petitioner, Deepak S. Kamble, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the demolition of his structures by...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Rule 8(1)(a) of Minerals Concession Rules, 2016 as Ultra Vires Section 10A(2)(c) of MMDR Act. Rule restricting transfer of mining leases to minerals not specified in First Schedule held inconsistent with parent Act.

1 Dec 2016

The judgment concerns a batch of writ petitions challenging the validity of Rule 8(1)(a) of the Minerals (Other than Atomic and Hydro Carbons Energy M...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Challenge to Rule 8(1)(a) of Minerals Concession Rules, 2016 by Mining Lessees. Rule requiring prior approval for transfer of mining leases for minerals not in First Schedule to MMDR Act held intra vires and not inconsistent with Section 10A(2)(c) of Amendment Act 2015.

1 Dec 2016

The petitioners, holders of mining leases for minerals not specified in the First Schedule to the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act,...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Assessment Order in Income Tax Case Due to Violation of Natural Justice — Failure to Provide Opportunity of Being Heard Before Dispute Resolution Panel. The court held that the Dispute Resolution Panel's failure to grant a hearing under Section 144C of the Income Tax Act, 1961, vitiated the assessment order under Section 143(3) of the Act.

24 Apr 2015

The petitioner, M/S Tejas Networks Limited, a company engaged in software development, manufacturing, and trading of networking equipment, filed its r...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging PF Damages and Interest Due to Non-Functioning of Appellate Tribunal — Directs Reconsideration of Damages Under Section 14-B of EPF Act. The court held that damages under Section 14-B are not automatic and require consideration of mitigating circumstances, and interest under Section 7-Q is compensatory but can be modulated.

2 Aug 2006

The petitioners, Cable Corporation of India Ltd. and another, challenged an order passed by the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner directing them to...

11 12 13 14 15

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)