Search Results for "Section 25F compliance"

168 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 168 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Full Bench Examines Correctness of Century Textile Interpretation on 'Unprotected Worker' Under Maharashtra Mathadi Act. Referred Question Seeks to Determine Whether Only Casually Engaged Workers Are Covered by the Act Under Section 2(11).

The Bombay High Court Full Bench was constituted to resolve a conflict arising from differing interpretations of Section 2(11) of the Maharashtra Math...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Reinstatement of Daily Wagers in Forest Department Termination Case. Oral Termination Without Due Process Constitutes Unfair Labour Practice Under MRTU and PULP Act.

The case involves four writ petitions filed by the State of Maharashtra through the Forest Department challenging the judgment and order dated 19 Nove...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Labour Court Award of Reinstatement with 20% Backwages for Illegal Termination. Termination of Workman Without Compliance with Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Held Illegal.

The petitioner, Maan Industries (India) Ltd., challenged the award dated 4.7.2019 passed by the Labour Court, Bhuj-Kutch in Reference (LCB) No. 70 of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Labour Court Award of Reinstatement with Back Wages. Termination of workman without compliance with Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 held illegal, and reinstatement with full back wages upheld.

The petitioner, M/s. Carona Ltd., challenged the judgment and order of the Labour Court, Mumbai, dated 30th September 2016, in Reference (IDA) No. 156...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Challenge to Reference of Minimum Wages Dispute to Industrial Tribunal. Settlement Barring Financial Demands Does Not Preclude Statutory Minimum Wages Claim Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The petitioner, Pix Transmissions Limited, an employer, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions of Sweepers Challenging Termination Without Inquiry. Termination of daily-wage sweepers by Municipal Council set aside for violation of Model Standing Orders and principles of natural justice.

The petitioners, Ram Pyarelal Khicher and Sunita Raju Paisadeli, were employed as sweepers by the Municipal Council, Ramtek. Ram was appointed on 8.12...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Nagpur Bench Dismisses Appeals by Workman Challenging Termination Orders in Complaints of Unfair Labour Practice; Non-Compliance of Industrial Disputes Act Provisions Not Found to Vitiate Termination of Daily-Wage Employee

These two Letters Patent Appeals, filed by the workman Sharad Dinkar Pachkhede, arose from two separate writ petitions which in turn originated from t...