Search Results for "Section 141 Negotiable Instruments Act"

273 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 273 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Proceedings Against Former Directors in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Prior Resignation. Directors Cannot Be Held Liable Under Section 141 of Negotiable Instruments Act When Cheques Were Issued After Their Resignation Was Statutorily Recorded in Form 32 Under Companies Act, 1956.

The Supreme Court addressed appeals concerning criminal liability of former directors in cheque dishonour cases under Section 138 of the Negotiable In...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Conviction Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for Dishonour of Cheque Issued for Repayment of Loan. Accused's Defence of Loan Repayment and Blank Cheque Fails as Presumption Under Sections 118 and 139 of N.I. Act Stands Rebutted.

The petitioner, B.N. Ashwath Narayan, was convicted by the XII Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bengaluru in C.C.No.28739/2001 for the offenc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Complaint Against Director in Minimum Wages Act Case Due to Lack of Vicarious Liability. Complaint Failed to Establish Director Was In-Charge of Company's Business Under Section 22C of Minimum Wages Act, 1948, Making Prosecution Unmaintainable.

The dispute arose from a criminal complaint filed against Dayle De'Souza, a director of Writer Safeguard Pvt. Ltd., alleging violations of the Minimum...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case, Reverses Acquittal. The court held that the trial court erred in failing to apply the presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, and that the accused failed to rebut the presumption.

The appellant, Doshi Brothers, a proprietary concern, filed a private complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, against M/s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Quashing of Complaint Set Aside. Sufficiency of Averments Under Section 141 NI Act for Partner Liability Determined on Holistic Reading of Complaint.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad which quashed criminal proceedings against the first respondent (a partn...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Discharge of Accused in Cheque Bounce Case Despite BIFR Proceedings. The court held that an order under Section 22 of SICA does not automatically bar criminal proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The petitioner, Harshad Jayprasad Bakshi, filed a criminal writ petition challenging the order of the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, 12th Court, Mum...