Bombay High Court Quashes Process and Bailable Warrant in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Non-Application of Mind. Court holds that issuance of process under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 without recording satisfaction as to existence of legally enforceable debt or liability is unsustainable.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 64
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The applicant, Hemant Mohan Agarwal, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of the order of issuance of process dated 15 February 2018 and the bailable warrant dated 6 April 2018 passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, 33rd Court, Ballard Pier, Mumbai in CC No. 11312/SS/2017. The respondent No. 1, Housing Development Finance Corporation Ltd., had filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, alleging dishonour of two cheques for Rs. 40,00,000 and Rs. 47,00,000 drawn on HDFC Bank. The applicant contended that the cheques were issued as security for a loan that had already been repaid, and that the Magistrate had passed the order of issuance of process mechanically without applying mind to the existence of a legally enforceable debt or liability. The High Court examined the complaint and the order and found that the Magistrate had merely recorded verification and issued process without any discussion or satisfaction regarding the debt. The court held that the order suffered from non-application of mind and was liable to be quashed. Consequently, the bailable warrant also stood quashed. The application was allowed.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure Code - Quashing of Process - Section 482 CrPC - Issuance of Process - The High Court quashed the order of issuance of process and bailable warrant in a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, as the Magistrate failed to apply mind to the existence of a legally enforceable debt or liability. The court held that the order was mechanical and without proper application of mind, rendering it unsustainable. (Paras 1-13)

B) Negotiable Instruments Act - Dishonour of Cheque - Section 138 - Legally Enforceable Debt - The court observed that the complaint did not disclose any legally enforceable debt or liability, as the cheques were allegedly issued as security for a loan that was already repaid. The Magistrate's order did not reflect any satisfaction on this aspect, leading to quashing. (Paras 3-10)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the order of issuance of process and bailable warrant against the applicant under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 was passed without application of mind and is liable to be quashed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court allowed the application, quashed the order of issuance of process dated 15/2/2018 and the bailable warrant dated 06/04/2018 passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, 33rd Court, Ballard Pier, Mumbai in CC No. 11312/SS/2017.

Law Points

  • Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act
  • 1881
  • issuance of process
  • non-application of mind
  • legally enforceable debt
  • quashing under Section 482 CrPC
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019:BHC-AS:29730

Criminal Application No. 538 of 2018

2019-10-04

S.S. Shinde, J.

2019:BHC-AS:29730

Mr. Satyavrat Joshi for Applicant, Mrs. M.R. Tidke, APP for Respondent – State, Mr. Ramakant Yadav i/by RHY Juris Law Asso for Respondent No. 1

Hemant Mohan Agarwal

Housing Development Finance Corporation Ltd. and State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal application under Section 482 CrPC for quashing of process and bailable warrant in a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of order of issuance of process dated 15/2/2018 and bailable warrant dated 06/04/2018 in CC No. 11312/SS/2017.

Filing Reason

The applicant alleged that the Magistrate passed the order of issuance of process mechanically without application of mind and without considering that the cheques were issued as security for a loan that was already repaid.

Previous Decisions

The learned Metropolitan Magistrate issued process on 15/2/2018 and bailable warrant on 06/04/2018.

Issues

Whether the order of issuance of process under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 was passed without application of mind? Whether the bailable warrant issued subsequently is liable to be quashed?

Submissions/Arguments

The applicant argued that the Magistrate did not apply mind to the existence of a legally enforceable debt or liability and passed the order mechanically. The respondent No. 1 opposed the application, but the court found the order unsustainable.

Ratio Decidendi

The issuance of process under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 requires the Magistrate to apply mind to the existence of a legally enforceable debt or liability. A mechanical order without such application is unsustainable and liable to be quashed under Section 482 CrPC.

Judgment Excerpts

The learned Metropolitan Magistrate was pleased to record the verification of the authorized representative of the complainant on 15th February 2018. On 15th February 2018 learned Metropolitan Magistrate, 33rd Court, Ballard Pier, Mumbai issued process against the applicant for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the said Act.

Procedural History

The respondent No. 1 filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 before the Metropolitan Magistrate, 33rd Court, Ballard Pier, Mumbai. The Magistrate recorded verification on 15/2/2018 and issued process. Subsequently, on 06/04/2018, a bailable warrant was issued. The applicant then filed the present application under Section 482 CrPC for quashing.

Acts & Sections

  • Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881: 138
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 482
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Process and Bailable Warrant in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Non-Application of Mind. Court holds that issuance of process under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 without recording satisfaction as to existence ...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Collector's Order Suspending Municipal Council Resolution for Lease of Land. Collector Exceeded Jurisdiction Under Section 308 of Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Parishads and Industrial Townsh...