Search Results for "Section 105 CPC"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...

Search Results for "Section 105 CPC"

411 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 411 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in MRTP Act Case — Notice Under Section 53(1) Challenged as Nullity for Shortfall in Statutory Period. Bar Under Section 149 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 Does Not Apply When Notice Itself Is Invalid for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Period.

20 Jan 2015

The appellant, Kishor S/o Ramalu @ Rambhau Telang, was the original plaintiff who received a notice dated 18.11.2010 under Section 53(1) of the Mahara...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Reserves Judgment in Writ Petition Against CIC Order Directing Disclosure of Husband's Income Tax Returns Under RTI Act. Petitioner Contended That Information Is Exempt Under Section 8(1)(e) of Right to Information Act, 2005, Being Held in Fiduciary Capacity by Income Tax Department.

21 Feb 2026

This writ petition was filed by the Income Tax Officer and Chief Public Information Officer (CPIO) of the Income Tax Department's Centralised Processi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Corrigendum Reducing Compensation under National Highways Act, 1956. Competent Authority Lacks Power to Review Award; Section 33 of Right to Fair Compensation Act Not Applicable Absent Notification Under Section 105(3).

20 Dec 2019

This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenged a corrigendum issued by the Competent Authority under the National Highways Act, 1...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers GST Liability on Royalty Payments to Court Receiver in Commercial Property Dispute. The Court Examines Whether Payments to a Court Receiver Under Order XL CPC Constitute Taxable Supply Under the CGST Act, 2017 and Whether GST Should be Discharged via Reverse Charge Mechanism.

13 Sep 2019

The Bombay High Court, in a Court Receiver's Report arising from a commercial suit for recovery of possession of three shops used as a restaurant, exa...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Respondents in Contempt for Breach of Injunction Order. Resolutions Increasing Authorised Capital and Alloting Shares While Restrained from Exercising Rights on Shares Amount to Wilful Disobedience.

15 Nov 2006

The appeal arose from Suit No.3121 of 2004, where the appellants (original plaintiffs, Gopal L. Raheja & Anr.) claimed that the respondents (original ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Regular First Appeals Against Trial Court Decree in Suit for Declaration and Permanent Injunction. Property Dispute Among Multiple Parties Pertaining to Immovable Property Under Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

1 Oct 2024

...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Hears Regular First Appeal in Partition Suit; Challenges Dismissal of Suit and Validity of Power of Attorney. Appeal Argues That Trial Court Erred in Burden of Proof and Framing of Issues Under Section 102 of Indian Evidence Act.

26 Mar 2025

...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Distribution Companies in Electricity Regulatory Dispute - Upholds APTEL's Direction for Merits-Based Disposal of Tariff Determination and Power Purchase Agreement Approval Petitions. Appellate Tribunal for Electricity Correctly Ordered State Commission to Decide Petitions on Merits After State Commission Allowed Withdrawal of One Petition and Dismissed the Other, Ensuring Statutory Functions Under Electricity Act, 2003 Are Fulfilled.

2 Feb 2022

The appeal arose from a dispute between Distribution Companies (DISCOMS) and Hinduja National Power Corporation Limited (HNPCL) regarding power purcha...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Execution of Decree by Excluding Time Spent in Wrong Forum Under Section 14 of Limitation Act — Bona Fide Prosecution Before Tehsildar Entitled to Exclusion. The Court held that the period spent in pursuing an execution application before a court lacking jurisdiction can be excluded under Section 14(2) of the Limitation Act, 1963, if the proceedings were conducted with due diligence and good faith.

17 Apr 2024

The present appeal arises from a decree for possession passed in 1986 in favor of the plaintiff (predecessor-in-interest of the appellants) against th...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Quashes Trial Court Order Impounding Agreement of Sale Already Admitted in Evidence; Holds That Once Document Admitted Without Objection, Its Admissibility Cannot Be Challenged Under Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957. The District Court's Revision Under Section 58 Was Maintainable Only by Court or Deputy Commissioner, Not by Private Party.

15 Dec 2022

The writ petition was filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order of the Trial Court directing impounding of an...

11 12 13 14 15

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)