Search Results for "Rule 28(6)"

426 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 426 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Second Appeal on Gift Deed Interpretation and Application of Section 14 of Hindu Succession Act, 1956. Appeal Challenges Appellate Court's Reversal of Trial Court Declaration That Widow Had No Alienation Rights Despite Lack of Cross-Objection.

The dispute concerned agricultural land at Survey No.72, mouza Sahuli, district Nagpur. The plaintiffs, two daughters of one Bajirao, filed a suit see...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Rejects Recusal Plea in Land Acquisition Reference. Judge Who Decided Smaller Bench Can Sit in Larger Bench to Reconsider Same Issue as Bias Plea Based on Extrajudicial Factors.

This order arises from a reference to a five-judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court of India concerning the interpretation of Section 24 of the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Public Interest Litigation Concerning Recruitment and Selection Process. Petition Challenges Appointments Made by State Authorities Alleging Irregularities in Selection.

The judgment text provided is incomplete, containing only the case heading, date, court, judges, advocates, and a list of parties. The matter is a wri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Admission of Winding-Up Petition Against Telecom Company Due to Substratum Erosion and Deadlock. Cancellation of 2G Licences and Irreconcilable Differences Between Equal Shareholders Justify Winding-Up Under Section 433(f) of the Companies Act, 1956.

The appeal arose from an order of the company judge admitting a petition for winding up of Etisalat D.B. Telecom Limited (the company) under Section 4...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Rehears Quashing Petition Against Lokayukta FIR for Disproportionate Assets After Supreme Court Remand; Petitioner Alleges Absence of Preliminary Enquiry and Non-Application of Mind by Superintendent of Police Under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The petitioner, a Superintendent Engineer in the Public Works Department, Government of Karnataka, filed a writ petition under Article 226 read with S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Peon Penalized for Turning Hostile in Criminal Trial, Holds That Hostility in Court Cannot Be Ground for Disciplinary Action. Witnesses Are Not Bound to Adhere to Previous Statements, and Penalty of Reduction to Minimum Pay Scale Permanently Set Aside.

The petitioner, Abdul Rauf Mohammed Khaja, was employed as a Peon (Watchman) in the Collector Office, Nanded. Disciplinary proceedings were initiated ...