Search Results for "Rule 12-A"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Rule 12-A"

165 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 165 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Madras Adjudicates Commercial Suit for Recovery of Outstanding Dues from Pharmaceutical Company. Suit Filed Under Order VII Rule 1 of O.S. Rules 1956 read with Order VII Rule 1 & 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 and the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, Seeking Payment of Rs.1,43,09,216 Based on Alleged Supply of Raw Materials and Confirmation Statements.

17 Feb 2025

The plaintiff, a sole proprietor supplying chemicals, filed a commercial suit for recovery of Rs.1,43,09,216 against the defendant company and its man...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Commercial Suit for Specific Performance Due to Non-Disclosure of Cause of Action and Lack of Readiness and Willingness. Plaintiff failed to prove readiness and willingness to perform her part of the agreement and did not disclose a valid cause of action for specific performance of an agreement to sell.

1 Sep 2023

The plaintiff, Miloni Shah, filed a Commercial Suit seeking specific performance of an agreement to sell dated 15th March 2019, allegedly entered into...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Summary Judgment in Commercial Suit for Unpaid Rent, Grants Unconditional Leave to Defend. Triable issues raised regarding termination of lease and liability of partners under the Indian Partnership Act, 1932.

19 Jun 2023

The plaintiff, PVR Ltd., filed a Commercial Summary Suit against the defendants, Proetus Ventures LLP and its partners, Shardul Bayas and Abhinay Rame...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Compounding Application in SEBI Act Case, Overturning Lower Court Decisions on Consent Requirement. Court Holds That Section 24A of Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 Does Not Mandate SEBI's Consent for Compounding, and Compounding Can Be Considered at Advanced Trial Stages Based on Factual Assessment.

23 Jul 2021

The dispute arose from a criminal prosecution under Section 24(1) of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992, against the appellant, a di...

High Court

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses PIL Challenging Tree Felling Permission for Mopa Airport Project. Appellate Authority's Order Under Goa, Daman and Diu Preservation of Trees Act, 1984 Upheld as Reasoned and Not Suffering from Non-Application of Mind.

8 Mar 2018

The petitioner, Federation of Rainbow Warriors, a society registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860, filed a Public Interest Litigation be...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue Appeals in Income Tax Exemption Cases for Charitable Trusts and Religious Institutions. Held that registration under Section 12AA and exemption under Section 11 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 cannot be denied solely on the ground of commercial activities if they are incidental to the charitable object.

22 Feb 2016

The High Court of Karnataka heard a batch of appeals filed by the Revenue under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, challenging the orders of t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Tender Cancellation by Zilla Parishad — No Right to Claim Contract After Tender Cancellation. The Court held that a tenderer has no vested right to have a tender accepted and that the authority can cancel the tender process for valid reasons, including financial constraints.

7 Aug 2015

The petitioners, a group of individuals and construction firms, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the d...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Externment Order Under Section 57 of Bombay Police Act, 1950 for Non-Compliance with Section 59 — Failure to Consider Less Drastic Measures and Provide Opportunity of Hearing. Externment Order Set Aside as Authority Did Not Comply with Mandatory Requirements of Section 59 of Bombay Police Act, 1950.

5 Oct 2012

The petitioner, Ashok @ Aau s/o Pitambar Choudhary, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Articles 14, 21, 226, and 227 of the Constitution of India ch...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Competent Authority Order in MOFA Dispute — Failure to Provide Hearing Violates Natural Justice. Section 5A of MOFA Requires Notice and Opportunity of Hearing Before Directing Conveyance of Land to Society.

31 Aug 2012

The petitioners, Mazda Construction Company, Maredia Enterprises, and Sultanabad CHS Ltd. (Proposed), challenged an order dated 11.04.2012 passed by t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Appointments to Deputy Commissioner of Labour Posts as Academic Due to Retirement of All Parties. Notification dated 06.05.1992 for appointments under Articles 14, 16, 309, 320 of Constitution of India held not to be examined on merits as no live controversy remains.

17 Feb 2010

The petitioner, Mrs. M.G. Khandagale, filed a Public Interest Litigation under Articles 14, 15, 16, 309, 320 and 226 of the Constitution of India chal...

11 12 13 14 15

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)