Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses PIL Challenging Tree Felling Permission for Mopa Airport Project. Appellate Authority's Order Under Goa, Daman and Diu Preservation of Trees Act, 1984 Upheld as Reasoned and Not Suffering from Non-Application of Mind.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 6
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Federation of Rainbow Warriors, a society registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860, filed a Public Interest Litigation before the Bombay High Court at Goa challenging the order dated 7 March 2018 passed by the Conservator of Forests (Appellate Authority) under the Goa, Daman and Diu Preservation of Trees Act, 1984. The Appellate Authority had upheld the permission granted by the Tree Officer (Deputy Conservator of Forests) on 6 February 2018 to fell 21703 trees at the proposed Mopa Airport site. The petitioner also sought to restrain the respondents from felling any trees pursuant to that permission. The court entertained the petition as the petitioner fulfilled the criteria for maintaining a PIL. The petitioner had earlier filed Appeal No.3/2018 before the Appellate Authority, which was disposed of on 7 March 2018, but the copy of the order was not immediately available. The matter was mentioned and kept on board, and the order was handed over by the Advocate General. The petitioner's counsel argued that there was complete non-application of mind by both the Tree Officer and the Conservator of Forests. It was also submitted that the petitioner had approached the National Green Tribunal challenging the environmental clearance for the project, and the NGT had initially granted an ad-interim order but later vacated it. The court heard the counsel for the petitioner and the Advocate General for the respondents. After considering the submissions, the court found that the Appellate Authority had considered the contentions raised by the petitioner and passed a reasoned order. The court held that there was no ground to interfere with the impugned order and dismissed the petition. The court also noted that the petitioner had an alternative remedy before the National Green Tribunal regarding environmental clearance, but that did not affect the present challenge under the Trees Act. The petition was dismissed with no order as to costs.

Headnote

A) Public Interest Litigation - Locus Standi - Maintainability - Petitioner society registered under Societies Registration Act, 1860, challenged tree felling permission for Mopa Airport - Court entertained the petition as petitioner fulfilled criteria for PIL (Paras 3).

B) Environmental Law - Tree Felling Permission - Goa, Daman and Diu Preservation of Trees Act, 1984 - Tree Officer granted permission to cut 21703 trees at Mopa Airport site on 6 February 2018 - Petitioner filed Appeal No.3/2018 before Conservator of Forests (Appellate Authority) - Appellate Authority dismissed appeal on 7 March 2018 - Petitioner challenged both orders alleging non-application of mind (Paras 2, 4, 6).

C) Administrative Law - Non-Application of Mind - Appellate Authority's Order - Petitioner argued that both Tree Officer and Conservator of Forests failed to apply mind - However, Court found that the Appellate Authority had considered the contentions and passed a reasoned order - No ground to interfere (Paras 6-7).

D) Environmental Law - Environmental Clearance - National Green Tribunal - Petitioner had earlier approached NGT challenging environmental clearance for the project - NGT granted ad-interim order but later vacated it - This fact was noted but not decisive for the present petition (Para 6).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the order dated 7 March 2018 passed by the Conservator of Forests (Appellate Authority) under the Goa, Daman and Diu Preservation of Trees Act, 1984, upholding the Tree Officer's permission to fell 21703 trees at the Mopa Airport site, suffers from non-application of mind and is liable to be set aside.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is dismissed. Rule discharged. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Public Interest Litigation
  • Locus Standi
  • Tree Felling Permission
  • Goa Daman and Diu Preservation of Trees Act 1984
  • Appellate Authority's Order
  • Non-Application of Mind
  • Environmental Clearance
  • National Green Tribunal
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2018 LawText (BOM) (03) 92

Public Interest Litigation WP No.1 of 2018

2018-03-08

N.M. Jamdar, Prithviraj K. Chavan

Nigel Da Costa Frias, M. Correia, D. Lawande, D. Shirodkar

Federation of Rainbow Warriors

The Deputy Conservator of Forests (North Goa Division), The Director, Directorate of Civil Aviation, The Conservator of Forests (Conservation), The State of Goa

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Public Interest Litigation challenging tree felling permission for Mopa Airport project.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought to quash the order dated 7 March 2018 of the Conservator of Forests (Appellate Authority) and to restrain respondents from felling trees at Mopa Airport site pursuant to permission dated 6 February 2018 to cut 21703 trees.

Filing Reason

Petitioner alleged non-application of mind by Tree Officer and Appellate Authority in granting and upholding permission to fell 21703 trees.

Previous Decisions

Tree Officer granted permission on 6 February 2018; Appellate Authority dismissed appeal on 7 March 2018; Petitioner had also approached National Green Tribunal regarding environmental clearance.

Issues

Whether the order of the Appellate Authority dated 7 March 2018 suffers from non-application of mind? Whether the permission to fell 21703 trees at Mopa Airport site is valid under the Goa, Daman and Diu Preservation of Trees Act, 1984?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that there was complete non-application of mind by both the Tree Officer and the Conservator of Forests. Petitioner submitted that the National Green Tribunal had earlier granted an ad-interim order restraining tree felling but later vacated it. Respondents argued that the Appellate Authority passed a reasoned order after considering contentions.

Ratio Decidendi

The Appellate Authority under the Goa, Daman and Diu Preservation of Trees Act, 1984 had considered the contentions raised by the petitioner and passed a reasoned order. There was no ground to interfere with the impugned order as the petitioner failed to establish non-application of mind.

Judgment Excerpts

The Petitioner has challenged the order passed by Conservator of Forests, Forest Department, Panaji Goa, the Appellate Authority, dated 7 March 2018 and has sought to restrain the Respondent Nos. 2 and 4 from felling any trees at the proposed Mopa Airport site in terms of the permission granted by the Tree Officer, dated 6 February 2018 to cut 21703 trees. We have heard Mr. Nigel Da Costa Frias, learned counsel for the Petitioner and Mr. D. Lawande, learned Advocate General for the Respondents. The learned counsel for the Petitioner submitted that there is complete non application of mind, by both the Tree Officer while passing the order granting permission and by the Conservator while disposing of the Appeal.

Procedural History

Petitioner filed Appeal No.3/2018 before the Conservator of Forests (Appellate Authority) under the Goa, Daman and Diu Preservation of Trees Act, 1984 challenging the Tree Officer's permission dated 6 February 2018 to fell 21703 trees at Mopa Airport site. The Appellate Authority dismissed the appeal on 7 March 2018. The petitioner then filed the present Public Interest Litigation before the High Court of Bombay at Goa on 8 March 2018, which was taken up for disposal by consent.

Acts & Sections

  • Goa, Daman and Diu Preservation of Trees Act, 1984:
  • Societies Registration Act, 1860:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses PIL Challenging Tree Felling Permission for Mopa Airport Project. Appellate Authority's Order Under Goa, Daman and Diu Preservation of Trees Act, 1984 Upheld as Reasoned and Not Suffering from Non-Application of Min...