Search Results for "Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959"

161 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 161 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Land Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Appellant's claim for injunction based on title failed as courts below concurrently held that the suit property was a public road and not part of appellant's land.

The appellant filed a Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the judgment and decree dated 18th February 20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Additional Commissioner's Orders in Gram Panchayat Disqualification Appeals. Delegation of Powers Under Section 13(3) of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 Remains Valid Despite Amendment to Section 16(2) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958.

The petitioner, Amitkumar Bankar, challenged orders of the Additional Commissioner dated 18.01.2023 that set aside the Collector's disqualification of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Dismissal of Appeal as Time-Barred Under Section 16(2) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959 — Limitation Runs from Date of Knowledge of Order.

The petitioner, Smt. Lalita Dhanraj Jadhav, challenged the order dated 16/06/2020 passed by the learned Additional Commissioner, Nashik Division, Nash...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Sarpanch's Petition Against Disqualification for Encroachment on Government Land — Interpretation of Section 14(1)(j-3) of Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1959 Requires Encroachment to be on Government Land as Defined Under Land Revenue Code.

The petitioner, Sau. Seema w/o Ramesh Khule, was elected as Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Gawandgaon in October 2017. Respondent No.4, Nandu s/o Bhikaji ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Removal of Sarpanch in Corruption Case. Registration of FIR and arrest under Prevention of Corruption Act constitutes disgraceful conduct under Section 39(1) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959, justifying removal without awaiting conviction.

The petitioner, Dr. Narendra Purushottam Ingole, was elected as a Member of Gram Panchayat Wadki in June 2015 and subsequently elected as Sarpanch. A ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging No-Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch in Gram Panchayat Dispute. Court holds that the motion was validly passed by a majority of members and the petitioners failed to establish any procedural irregularity under the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act.

The case involves a dispute regarding a no-confidence motion passed against the Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Kasbe Sukene, Taluka Niphad, District Nashi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Sarpanch Election for Lack of Locus Standi and Alternative Remedy. Non-Voters Cannot Maintain Writ Petition Under Article 226 for Election Irregularities Under Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959.

The petitioners, who are residents of Bhandara district but not voters in the concerned Gram Panchayat, filed writ petitions under Article 226 of the ...