Search Results for "MOFA Act"

166 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 166 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Promoter's Appeal in RERA Case, Holding That Acceptance of Delayed Possession Without Protest Does Not Waive Right to Interest Under Section 18 of RERA. Statutory Right to Interest Under RERA Cannot Be Waived by Mere Acceptance of Possession Without a Clear Agreement.

The case involves a Second Appeal filed by CCI Projects Private Limited (the promoter) against an order of the Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate Tribu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds Pending Civil Suits Not a Bar to Deemed Conveyance Under MOFA: Quantum Park CHS v. AHCL-PEL & Ors

The Bombay High Court allowed the writ petition filed by Quantum Park Cooperative Housing Society and quashed the order rejecting its application for ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Order Rejecting Plaint in Suit for Injunction and Declaration — Dispute Over Common Passage in Residential Building. Court Holds That Disputed Passage Is Not an 'Open Space' Under MOFA Section 1A(e) and That the Suit Is Not Barred by Limitation or Res Judicata.

The appellants, Zenobia R. Poonawala and Rohinton Poonwala, are residents of Flat No.9 in Rutton Manor, a residential building in Colaba, Mumbai. They...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Compromise Between Plaintiffs and Defendant Nos.8-11 in Property Suit — Consent Terms Accepted Despite Objections from Other Defendants. Partial Settlement Under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC Does Not Affect Rights of Non-Settling Defendants Who May Continue to Contest the Suit.

The suit was filed by 35 plaintiffs seeking a declaration that they are purchasers of certain property. The matter was listed for settlement as the pl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeals by Developer in Possession Suits — Concurrent Findings of Fact Cannot Be Reopened Under Section 100 CPC. Suits for possession based on title and prior possession were decreed; no substantial question of law arose.

The appellant, M/s. Samruddhi Developers, a partnership firm, filed four second appeals under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Property Dispute Over Flat Allotment and Possession. Court upholds concurrent findings that appellants failed to prove title or possession, and that the suit was not barred by limitation or the Cooperative Societies Act.

The case involves a second appeal by original defendant nos. 7 and 8 (appellants) against the judgment and decree of the District Court, Pune, which c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in MOFA Agreement Dispute Due to Delay and Conduct — Termination of Agreement Upheld as Plaintiffs Failed to Seek Timely Interim Relief.

The appellants, Purnimakumari Dharmendra Jain and Dharmendra Khetalal Jain, filed a suit in the Bombay High Court seeking a declaration that an agreem...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Arbitration Petition for Appointment of Arbitrator in Family Property Dispute — No Arbitration Agreement Exists Between Parties. Will Clause Cannot Substitute Arbitration Agreement Under Section 7 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Mrs. Padmini Chandran Menon, filed an Arbitration Petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking app...