Search Results for "Income Tax recovery"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...

Search Results for "Income Tax recovery"

1005 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1005 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal for Lack of Jurisdiction in Income Tax Case. Appeal against Bangalore Bench of ITAT lies only before Karnataka High Court under Section 260A of Income Tax Act, 1961.

26 Feb 2019

The case involves an appeal filed by the Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -3, Pune under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, challenging an order ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Late Filing Fee Under Section 234E of Income Tax Act. Petitioners Seek Declaration that Section 234E is Unconstitutional and Violative of Articles 14, 265, and 277.

12 Jun 2015

This batch of writ petitions was filed before the High Court of Karnataka under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the cons...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Batch of Appeals Challenging Suo Motu Revision Orders Under KVAT Act. Appeals Raise Issues of Input Tax Credit Denial Based on Supplier's Registration Status, Limitation Period for Revision, and Mandatory Penalty Provisions.

7 Jul 2026

...

High Court

High Court of Bombay hears writ petition challenging constitutional validity of Section 48(5) of MVAT Act, 2002 on input tax credit set-off — Petitioner seeks reading down of 'actually paid' to 'ought to have been paid'

11 May 2012

The writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was filed by a partnership firm registered as a dealer under the Maharashtra Value Ad...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Section 44C Interpretation Matter, Upholds Assessee's Claim for Full Deduction of Exclusive Expenses. Exclusive Expenditure Incurred by Head Office Solely for Indian Branches Not Governed by Section 44C Limitation, Fully Allowable Under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

1 Jan 1970

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Service Tax Case on Bifurcation of Interest and Service Charges. Tribunal's finding that no service tax liability arises prior to 01.03.2006 due to absence of mechanism for bifurcation of value of service from interest amount upheld.

12 Feb 2021

The appeal was filed by the Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, challenging the order of the Cust...

High Court

KAHC010217682014_1

12 Jun 2015

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue Appeal in TDS Dispute on License Fee — Payment for Use of Hotel Property Held as 'Rent' Under Section 194-I of Income Tax Act, 1961. License fee paid by assessee for use of hotel premises constitutes rent liable for TDS, and failure to deduct attracts consequences under Section 201.

2 Dec 2015

The appeal was filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, challenging the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Petitions Against TDS Notices Issued to Turf Clubs Under Section 194B of Income Tax Act — Argued That Stake Money Is Not Winnings. Petitioners Contend That CBDT Circular No.467 Exempts Stake Money From TDS and That Such Payments Are Business Income Taxable Under Section 74A, Not Winnings Under Section 194B.

26 Sep 2014

The batch of writ petitions before the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore arose from notices issued by the Income Tax Department to turf clubs in Ba...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award Directing Indemnity for Depreciation Disallowance. Petitioners Argue that Clause 14 of Lease Agreement Does Not Cover Income Tax Depreciation Denial and Rely on Identical Clause Interpretation in Prior Judgment.

20 Jan 2015

The dispute arose from a lease agreement executed in 1997 between Borosil Glass Works Limited (lessee/petitioner) and Tata Motors Limited (lessor/resp...

11 12 13 14 15

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)