Search Results for "Grampanchayat member"

216 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 216 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds No-Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch and Upa-Sarpanch Under Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act. Procedural Irregularities Such as Lack of Proposer and Seconder and Secret Ballot Demand Found Not Fatal to the Motion's Validity as Majority Rule Prevails.

The petitioners, Sarpanch and Upa-Sarpanch of Grampanchayat Rahuwadi, were elected from a body of eleven members. On 3rd October 2023, seven members s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Ex-Parte Removal of Sarpanch Under Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961 — Violation of Natural Justice. Failure to Provide Opportunity of Hearing Before Removal Renders Order Unsustainable.

The petitioner, Sunil Daulat Patil, was the Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Tambole, Taluka Chalisgaon, District Jalgaon. Respondent No. 5, Digambar Bhagwa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Village Panchayat Election Dispute — No Appeal Lies Against Collector's Order Under Section 33(5) of Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958. The court held that the Collector's order under Section 33(5) is final and no appeal lies to the Commissioner.

The appellant, Ashok Sitaram Misal, contested the election for the post of Sarpanch of Grampanchayat Kukkadgaon held on 11/10/2008. Respondent No.3, M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Rejection of Nomination Objections in Gram Panchayat Elections. Election Dispute Under Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959 - Court Holds That Orders of Returning Officer Are Not Subject to Writ Jurisdiction Under Article 226.

The petitioners, Shivaji Laxman Wadkar and Kiran Daulat Gosavi, filed two separate writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India befor...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Sarpanch's Petition Challenging No-Confidence Motion Under Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act. Notice of No-Confidence Cannot Be Withdrawn Once Given; Bar of Two Years Applies to Moving of Motion, Not Notice.

The petitioner, Vijay Ramdas Kokate, was the Sarpanch of a Gram Panchayat. On 8th February 2022, a notice of no-confidence was given to the Tahsildar ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Gram Panchayat Election Process for Non-Compliance with Pre-Election Deposit Requirement. Petitioners failed to deposit required amount under Rule 7(2) of Maharashtra Gram Panchayat (Election) Rules, 2014, leading to rejection of nomination papers.

The petitioners, residents of Khuneshwar village in Solapur district, filed two writ petitions challenging the election process for the Gram Panchayat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Jurisdiction of Civil Court in Election Petition Under Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act. The Court held that the ground of age disqualification (below 21 years) is a valid ground for an election petition under Section 15 of the Act.

The petitioner, Sau. Soni w/o Gajanan Kurkute, was elected as a member of Gram Panchayat Taroda. The respondent No.2, Sau. Nanda w/o Ganesh Khandale, ...