KAHC010403282026_2
23 Jul 2026The petitioner, a partnership firm, challenged the award of a rate contract for supply of Liquid Sodium Hypochlorite Solution 5% 5ltr (drug code 430) ...
Search Results for "Fatal Defect"
376 result(s) found
Found 376 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Contractual Forfeiture Case — HUDCO Cannot Forfeit Payments Without Fulfilling Reciprocal Obligations. Allotment Cancellation and Forfeiture of Rs. 28.11 Crores Set Aside as Unjust Enrichment Where Lessor Failed to Execute Agreement to Sub-Lease.
7 Feb 2025The dispute arose from an allotment letter issued by HUDCO to Tomorrowland Limited for a 99-year lease of land to build a 5-star hotel. The appellant ...
- 809
High Court
Bombay High Court Rejects Plaint in Commercial Summary Suit for Non-Compliance with Pre-Institution Mediation Under Section 12-A of Commercial Courts Act, 2015. The court held that the plaintiff failed to demonstrate genuine urgency to bypass mandatory pre-institution mediation, as the suit sought recovery of development management fees and security deposit without any specific instances of imminent threat.
11 Nov 2024The plaintiff, Ekta Housing Private Limited, filed a Commercial Summary Suit against Shraddha Shelters Pvt. Ltd. and two individual guarantors for rec...
- 883
High Court
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Bribery Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.
25 Aug 2022The appellant, Anil Meshram, a BSNL employee, was convicted by the Special Judge, Gadchiroli for demanding and accepting a bribe of Rs. 1,500 from com...
- 38
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Kalaburagi Bench Considers Second Appeal in Suit for Permanent Injunction, Frames Substantial Questions of Law Regarding Pleadings and Title Dispute
9 Dec 2021This Regular Second Appeal arose out of an original suit for permanent injunction in a property dispute. The plaintiff claimed ownership and possessio...
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Invalid Sanction. Sanction order under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 must show application of mind and failure to do so vitiates prosecution.
20 Feb 2020The State of Maharashtra filed an appeal against the acquittal of the respondent (original accused) by the Special Judge, Pune, for offences under Sec...
- 72
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Election Petition Rejection Application — Material Particulars Sufficiently Disclosed. Order 7 Rule 11 CPC Rejection Not Warranted When Election Petition Contains Necessary Allegations of Non-Disclosure in Nomination Form.
22 Mar 2018The case involves a Civil Revision Application filed by Ashok Rajaram Raul (the applicant) against an order dated 5 December 2017 passed by the 6th Jo...
- 73
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Writ Petition Challenging Exclusion of 467 Days Under Section 14 of Limitation Act for Filing Section 34 Application Under Arbitration Act. The court held that Section 14 of the Limitation Act does not apply to applications under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and the Union of India failed to demonstrate due diligence.
24 Apr 2017The petitioner, M/s DDL Excavation Pvt. Ltd., and the respondent, Union of India (UOI), entered into an agreement for execution of works in Goa. Dispu...
- 148
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal by Town Municipal Council in Land Acquisition Dispute — Plaintiff's Suit for Declaration and Possession Dismissed for Lack of Title and Limitation. The court held that acquisition under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 extinguishes prior title and the plaintiff failed to prove possession within limitation.
3 Jul 2014The appeal arises from a suit filed by the original plaintiff (since deceased, represented by LRs) against the Town Municipal Council, Sindagi, and St...
- 64
High Court
Bombay High Court Examines Executability of Civil Court Decree in Light of Purchase Certificates Issued Under Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act. Decree for Joint Possession Challenged by Judgment-Debtors Claiming Ownership Under Section 32M of the Tenancy Act, Rendering Decree Inexecutable.
7 Oct 2006The Bombay High Court entertained a writ petition arising from the order dated 28.7.1986 of the Civil Judge, Junior Division, Islampur, rejecting an a...
