Search Results for "Extended limitation"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Extended limitation"

1843 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1843 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Liquidator's Appeal on Limitation Grounds in Insolvency Proceeding. Limitation period under Section 61 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 runs from the date the order is made available, not from pronouncement, applying Section 420(3) of the Companies Act, 2013 and Rule 50 of the National Company Law Tribunal Rules, 2016 for free copies.

22 Oct 2021

The appeal arose from a judgment of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) dated 13 July 2020, which dismissed the appellant's appeal as ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Port Trust's Appeal in Licence Fee Recovery Case Due to Limitation Bar. Recovery Proceedings Under Public Premises Act, 1971 Held Time-Barred as Cause of Action Arose in 2010 and Proceedings Initiated in 2015 Exceed Three-Year Limit Under Limitation Act, 1963.

3 Apr 2025

The dispute arose from the New Mangalore Port Trust (NMPT) allotting land to licensees for loading and unloading goods, with licence fees subject to r...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Admiralty Suits as Time-Barred Under Limitation Act. Claims for Loss of Vessel and Cargo Filed Beyond Three-Year Limitation Period from Date of Vessel's Sinking.

17 Sep 2018

The judgment concerns two admiralty suits filed in the Bombay High Court. Admiralty Suit No.3 of 2011 was filed by the time charterer of the vessel 'N...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Electricity Negligence Case — Sets Aside Compensation Award Due to Limitation Bar. Suit for Compensation for Death Due to Electrocution Filed Beyond Limitation Period of One Year Under Article 82 of Limitation Act, 1963.

21 Sep 2017

The case involves a suit for compensation filed by the respondents (plaintiffs) against the appellants (defendants), the Maharashtra State Electricity...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Stockbroker Dispute, Upholds Limitation and Maintainability. The Court held that the claim was within limitation due to acknowledgement of debt and that the arbitration application was maintainable despite directors' disqualification.

9 Jul 2019

The Appellant, Kaynet Finance Limited, a member-broker at the National Stock Exchange of India, was appointed by the Respondent, Verona Capital Limite...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Quashes Prosecution Under MRTP Act Due to Limitation Bar — Non-Compliance with Demolition Notice Held Not a Continuing Offence. The Court held that offence under Section 53(7) of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966, is complete upon failure to comply with notice within prescribed period, and the mere continuance of unauthorized construction does not keep the offence alive for purposes of limitation under Section 468 Cr.P.C.

12 Feb 2013

The petitioners, who were accused in a criminal case under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966, challenged the rejection of their ple...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Award Rejecting Counterclaims as Time-Barred. Court holds that limitation for counterclaims arising from same transaction as main claim is governed by Article 1 of Limitation Act, 1963, and that the arbitral tribunal erred in applying a strict three-year period from the date of termination without considering the continuing breach and the date of final bill.

1 Oct 2012

The petitioner, Rolta India Limited, filed two arbitration petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an in...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows Appeals by Garment Dealers in CST Act Reassessment Case — Reopening of Assessment Beyond Four Years Without Allegation of Fraud or Suppression of Facts is Invalid. The court held that the Additional Commissioner's suo motu revision under Section 9(2) of CST Act read with Section 39 of KVAT Act was barred by limitation as no fraud or wilful suppression was alleged.

7 Dec 2017

The case involves multiple appeals filed by garment dealers from Bellary under Section 66(1) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (KVAT Act) aga...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Defendant in Commercial Suit to File Written Statement Despite Expiry of 120-Day Limit Due to COVID-19 Disruptions. Time Limit Under Proviso to Order VIII Rule 1 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 as Substituted by Commercial Courts Act, 2015 Extended Considering Orders in Suo Motu Writ Petition (Civil) No. 3 of 2020 and Administrative Curtailment of Court Functioning.

14 Feb 2022

The dispute arose from a commercial suit filed by the plaintiff-respondent against the defendant-appellant for recovery of Rs. 3,73,24,821/- with inte...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Consumer Dispute Over Limitation and Maintainability Under Consumer Protection Act 1986. Complaint Barred by Limitation as Cause of Action Arose When Municipal Authorities First Demanded Higher Charges, Not Continuing, and Not Maintainable as Appellant Not a Consumer Under Section 2(1)(d) for Property Tax and Water Services Provided by Municipal Authorities.

11 Jan 2022

The appeal originated from a judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission dated 3 December 2018, which dismissed a consumer complai...

11 12 13 14 15

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)